Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.28 seconds)
Documents citing Rajesh Singhal And Anr vs State And Anr on 9 February, 2010

Rajesh Singhal vs Satyapal Verma on 24 January, 2013

1. This contempt petition has been filed by Mr. Rajesh Singhal s/o Sugan Lal aged 43 years by caste Agarwal r/o Jaisal Nagar, Jodhpur against a judicial officer, Mr. Satyapal Verma, ACJM (Paryavaran) Pali purportedly for having committed the breach and disobedience of the orders passed by this Court on 20/7/2011 in S.B.Criminal Misc. Petition No. 1153/2011 - Rajesh Singhal v/s State & anr. (Chandra Bhanu s/o Ghisa Lal - complainant) filed for quashing of standing warrant of arrest against the petitioner by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pali.
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - V Kothari - Full Document

Rajesh Kumar Sanghal vs State Of Haryana on 18 May, 2026

2. Counsel further referred to an order dated 14.10.2025 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, New Delhi District, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi in Cr. Rev. No. 426/2025 titled as “Rajesh Kumar Sanghal and Anr. vs. State and Anr.”. Vide aforesaid order, a lien has been marked on a sum of 16,57,54,100/- (Rupees Sixteen Crore, Fifty Seven ₹ Lakhs, Fifty Four Thousand and One Hundred only) lying in the bank account of M/s Babli Investment Private Limited, to whom Sneh Kirti Nagda had transferred the shares. It was on a complaint filed by the petitioners. It shows the bonafide of the petitioners.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rajesh Kumar Sanghal vs State Of Haryana on 25 February, 2026

2. Counsel further referred to an order dated 14.10.2025 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, New Delhi District, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi in Cr. Rev. No. 426/2025 titled as “Rajesh Kumar Sanghal and Anr. vs. State and Anr.”. Vide aforesaid order, a lien has been marked on a sum of ₹16,57,54,100/- (Rupees Sixteen Crore, Fifty Seven Lakhs, Fifty Four Thousand and One Hundred only) lying in the bank account of M/s Babli Investment Private Limited, to whom Sneh Kirti Nagda had transferred the shares. It was on a complaint filed by the petitioners. It shows the bonafide of the petitioners.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - R Bindal - Full Document
1