Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.28 seconds)
Documents citing Pride Construction Co. vs Delhi Development Authority on 31 October, 1991

M/S Pride Constructions vs Delhi Development Authority on 23 August, 2017

CS No. 4/17/98              Pride Constructions Vs DDA                     15/29 35 In the cross-examination he deposed that he has not placed on record the copy of the partnership deed of M/s Pride Constructions. The work was to be started within 10 days of the letter of award. The time for completion of work was 5 months. The work was not completed within the stipulated period. As far as he know the work was completed in about 39 months. He denied the suggestion that delay of just 416 days was justifiable. However, he was given the benefit of delay of 416 days. He denied the suggestion that levy of penalty/compensation udner clause 2 of the agreement was not challengable in the court of law or that the decision of the S.E was the final.
Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Joginder Kumar Gandhi vs D.D.A. And Anr. on 26 May, 1999

In the case of M/s. Pride Construction (Supra) , this court found that since the arbitrator held that the petitioner could not come to know about the increase in labour wages upto the time of submitting of its tender, the contractor becomes entitled for the extra amount only under Clause 10-C if he properly pays the increased wages under the notification. It was further held that since there was no dispute that the contractor did pay the wages as increased by the notification dated 23.2.1982 and the petitioner was claiming only that amount, which was upheld by the arbitrator , therefore, the court found that there was no reasonable ground and reason to differ with the view taken by the arbitrator which was found to be reasonable.
Delhi High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1