Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.49 seconds)

Vijay Mann @ Kapil vs State (Nct Of Delhi) on 18 December, 2020

17. Let us examine the present bail application in view of the above law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. Perusal of the material brought on record reveals involvement of petitioner Digvijay Saroha to the effect that he has been a part of organized crime syndicate and has knowingly facilitated the alleged organized crime syndicate. The MCOCA does not contemplate that the petitioner should have direct role to play as regards the commissionof an organised crime. If there is a nexus of the petitioner who is a member of an, 'organised crime syndicate', or nexus with the offence in the nature of an, 'organised crime' is established, the petitioner will prima facie satisfy the ingredients of Section 3(2) of MCOCA. In the present case, the petitioner Digvijay Saroha is alleged to be a member of an organized crime syndicate run by Jitender @ Gogi. There are approximately 27 cases filed against this organized crime syndicate. As per reply filed by the prosecution, there is confessional statement of co-accused Yogesh, which reveals that petitioner Digvijay Saroha is the member of an organized crime syndicate being run by Jitender @ Gogi. It has also come on record that during interrogation petitioner/ accused Digvijay Saroha has disclosed that he is an active member of Jitender @ Gogi Gang and used to collect information regarding members of opposite gang as well suspected targets from whom money can be extorted. During the investigation one witness namely Ms. Nikita Dahiya has deposed that this 'Organised Crime Syndicate' used to collect extortion money from her and accused Digvijay Saroha is one of the associates of this gang, who used to collect protection money from her. Thus, Prima facie, the prosecution has established petitioner's role in conspiring, assisting and managing Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:PRATHIBA M SINGH CRL.M.C. 1625/2020 Page 20 of 22 Signing Date:18.12.2020 14:31 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:DINESH SINGH NAYAL Signing Date:18.12.2020 15:11:46 the crime syndicate. There are no reasonable grounds to believe that petitioner is not guilty of the offences, he has been charged with. On the contrary, the material brought on record, points to his role in the abetment of the offences committed by the crime syndicate."
Delhi High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 1 - P M Singh - Full Document

Insp Harnder Singh vs State on 25 November, 2023

1. Vide this order, I shall decide the revision petition being filed by the applicant/revisionist against the impugned order dated 17.02.2023 passed by the court of Ld. MM-01, North District, Rohini Courts, Delhi in connection to the application u/s 97 Cr.P.C. titled as 'Mohd. Irfan vs. State of NCT of Delhi' whereby the ld. MM was pleased to pass the order for directing the DCP to register an FIR against the SHO and erring officials of PS Bhalaswa Dairy and aggrieved against the said impugned order dated 17.02.2023, the instant revision petition is filed on the following grounds :-
Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1