Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13802 (3.65 seconds)
Documents citing Damodar S.Prabhu vs Sayed Babalal H on 3 May, 2010

Dhan Sanchai Co Operative Thrift Credit ... vs Vinod Kumar on 1 April, 2026

As per the guidelines laid down in Damodar S. Prabhu Vs. Sayed Babalal H, AIR 2010 (SC) 1907, Ahlmad is directed to make a mention on the summons issued against the accused (by adding separate sheet, if required) that "accused can make an application for compounding of the offence at the first and second hearing of the case and if such an application is made, compounding may be allowed by the Court without imposing any costs on the accused." Digitally signed by SHRUTI SHRUTI SHARMA SHARMA Date:
Delhi District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sunil Thakur vs . M/S Neelkanth on 25 October, 2024

Therefore, in those matters where the case has to be decided/settled in the Lok Adalat, if the court finds that it is a result of the positive attitude of the parties, in such appropriate cases, the court can always reduce the costs by imposing minimal costs or even waive the same. For that, it would be for the parties, particularly the accused person, to make out a plausible case for the waiver/reduction of costs and to convince the court concerned about the same. This course of action, according to us, would strike a balance between the two competing but equally important interests, namely, achieving the objectives delineated in Damodar S. Prabhu [Damodar S. Prabhu v. Sayed Babalal H., (2010) 5 SCC 663: (2010) 2 SCC (Civ) 520 : (2010) 2 SCC (Cri) 1328] on the one hand and the public interest which is sought to be achieved by encouraging settlements/resolution of case through the Lok Adalats on the other hand."
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S The Premier Woods vs . M/S Agrti Casa on 25 November, 2020

Matter be taken up now on 23.03.2021. As per the guidelines laid down as in the case titled as "Damodar S. Prabhu Vs. Sayed Babalal H", AIR2010(SC) 1907, Ahlmad is directed to make a mention on the summons issued against the accused (by adding separate sheet, if required) that "accused can make an application for compounding of the offence at the first and second hearing of the case and if such an application is made, compounding may be allowed by the Court without imposing any costs on the accused."
Delhi District Court Cites 37 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Vishvaskumar Babubhai Chaudhari vs State Of Gujarat on 28 June, 2022

In the instant case, when the cheque amount is repaid and no due certificate is issued, as per the guidelines of Honourable the Supreme Court of India, in para:21, in the case of Damodar S. Prabhu vs. Sayed Babalal H. (supra), the complaint against the present applicant, even after the judgment of conviction passed against the applicant, can be quashed rater relegating the applicant to file appeal against the said judgment of conviction.
Gujarat High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - N S Desai - Full Document

Mr. Sushil Kumar Churiwala vs Mr. Akshay Bansal on 10 December, 2024

In Damodar S. Prabhu [Damodar S. Prabhu v. Sayed Babalal H., (2010) 5 SCC] this Court had emphasised that the compensatory aspect of the remedy under Section 138 of the NI Act must be preferred and has encouraged litigants to resolve disputes amicably. The Court observed : (SCC pp. 670-73, paras 18-19 & 23) "18. It is quite obvious that with respect to the offence of dishonour of cheques, it is the compensatory aspect of the remedy which should be given priority over the punitive aspect. There is also some support for the apprehensions raised by the learned Attorney General that a majority of cheque bounce cases are indeed being
Karnataka High Court Cites 42 - Cited by 0 - V Srishananda - Full Document

Sh. Harswaroop vs Sh. Prem Raj @ Rajesh on 5 September, 2019

In these specific facts and circumstances, keeping in view the above said submissions of applicant/accused, the interest of justice would be served if the appellant is burdened with the costs of Rs. 30,000/- to be deposited with New Delhi District Legal Services Authority (NDDLSA) in terms of judgment Damodar S. Prabhu (Supra ). The bank receipt qua deposit of the said amount has been furnished on record by the appellant. 9 The impugned judgment dated 30.01.2019 and order on sentence dated 0402.2019 both qua the appellant/convict are accordingly set aside in view of the composition of the offence under section 138 NI Act.
Delhi District Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next