Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.32 seconds)
Documents citing Swati vs Arvind Mudgal on 29 January, 2015

Arvind @ Sandeep And 4 Others vs State Of U.P. And Another on 4 April, 2024

11. Considering the fact as well as on perusal of record, it appears that no heinous and serious offences on mental depravity or other offences, which may affect the society in general, are made out and both the parties have amicably settled their dispute through compromise which has been duly verified by the court below by order dated 05.05.2022 as well as in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Another ; (2012) 10 SCC 303, Narinder Singh & Others vs. State of Punjab & Another (2014) 6 SCC 477, State of M.P. Vs. Laxmi Narayan, (2019) 5 SCC 688 and State of M.P. vs. Dhruv Gurjar, AIR 2017 SC 1106, the proceeding of Complaint Case No. 4042 of 2017 (Swati Vs. Arvind & others) under section 498-A, 323, 504, 506 IPC, 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S. Inchauli, District Meerut, pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 9, Meerut, is hereby quashed.
Allahabad High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Deepa Tomar vs Ajay @ Leeladhar Singh Tomar on 14 May, 2024

In similar facts and circumstances, the High Court of Delhi in the case of Swati Vs. Arvind Mudgal (MAT.APP.5/2013) granted a decree of divorce on the grounds of the conviction of the husband under the provisions of IPC. Therefore, although under the Hindu Marriage Act, there is no such 8 provision for the grant of divorce on account of conviction of wife or husband, as the case may be, for life imprisonment, there is the provision of grant of divorce on the ground of mental cruelty. Therefore, the conviction of the husband under Section 302 of IPC and sentence of life imprisonment amounts to mental cruelty towards the wife which entails her getting the divorce from her husband.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - V Rusia - Full Document

Nisha Praveen Patil vs Praveen Manohar Patil on 18 February, 2020

16. The Delhi High Court in the case of Swati v. Arvind Mudgal reported in 2015 SCC online Del 6930 has opined that the offence of murder committed by the respondent therein resulting in life imprisonment, had caused immense pain, agony and apprehension in the mind of the petitioner therein that it was not safe for her to stay with the respondent therein anymore which was sufficient to dissolve the marriage on the ground of cruelty.
Karnataka High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt.Nisha Praveen Patil, vs Shri.Praveen Manohar Patil, on 18 February, 2020

16. The Delhi High Court in the case of Swati v. Arvind Mudgal reported in 2015 SCC online Del 6930 has opined that the offence of murder committed by the respondent therein resulting in life imprisonment, had caused immense pain, agony and apprehension in the mind of the petitioner therein that it was not safe for her to stay with the respondent therein anymore which was sufficient to dissolve the marriage on the ground of cruelty.
Karnataka High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1