Fir No. 120/2007, Ps Mirzapur, ... vs . Sailesh Harshadrai Jani & Ors. 1 Of 39 on 26 October, 2018
She had not placed the paper of divorce before any court
including this court. She tried to submit the same to the police
officials as she was divorcee at the time of marriage with present
accused but police official refused to receive the same stating that she
would produce the same before the court. It was wrong to suggest that
she did not get married with accused Sailesh Harsadhrai Jani on
02.05.2006. It was wrong to suggest that she never got divorced from
FIR No. 120/2007, PS Mirzapur, Ahmedabad; CC No. 616833/2016 State Vs. Sailesh Harshadrai Jani & Ors. 11 of 39
her previous husband. It was wrong to suggest that as on date, her
marriage with earlier husband was still valid and surviving. She could
not place the photographs of marriage as the accused took away all the
photographs. She did not try to contact with photographer who took
the marriage photographs as the photographs were taken from mobile
and personal camera of one Bimal and no photographer was hired on
the occasion of her marriage. Her brother or she herself did not have a
mobile so they did not take the photographs of her marriage from the
side of bride. Her relatives such as her sister, mother, masi, brother
and her neighbour namely Sukhwinder, her bhabi and one Mr
Kamlesh were all present in her marriage from her side. None of them
were having mobile phone at that time. It was wrong to suggest that
she had not married with accused due to which neither she nor her
relative possess any photograph of her marriage. It was correct that
she did not apply for obtaining marriage certificate before the
Registrar of marriages. She did not apply the same as the same was
not required by her. It was correct that she had a house in joint name
of her and her previous husband, at Ahmedabad i.e. B504, Sukirti
Garden, Opposite Aamar Kadam Banglow Satellite, Ahmedabad15
and she had sold out the aforesaid house to one Giri Raj Singh in the
year 2009. However, she did not receive any consideration amount for
the aforesaid house as Giri Raj was not intended to pay her because of
the objection of her previous husband.