Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.02 seconds)
Documents citing State Of Karnataka vs Harijan Dharma And Another on 23 January, 1992

State By J.J.Nagar Police vs Akhil @ Akhil Shariff on 14 January, 2019

In support of his arguments the learned counsel for the accused has relied upon a decision reported in 1992 SCC Online KAR 38 held between State of Karnataka Vs. Harijan Dharma and another thereby submitted that, the object of Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, is a reformative measure and its object is 16 Spl CC No.168/2016 to re-claim amateur offenders who can be usefully rehabilitated in the society its object is to prevent conversion of youthful offenders into obdurate criminals as a result of their association with hardened criminals of mature age in case the youthful offenders are sentenced to undergo imprisonment in jail. Further he submitted basing on these submissions, made by him he prayed to impose sentence on the accused keeping in mind the future of the accused, as well as in the interest of Natural Justice.
Bangalore District Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Thimmaiah S/O Rangaiah vs State Of Karnataka on 8 April, 2022

6. The learned counsel also relied upon the Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of STATE OF 7 KARNATAKA v. HARIJAN DHARMA AND ANOTHER reported in (1992) 2 Kant.LJ 85 and brought to the notice of this Court paragraph No.12 with regard to invoking of P.O. Act taking the age of the petitioner as 18 years and held that the Act is a reformative measure and its object is to reclaim amateur offenders who can be usefully rehabilitated in the society. Its object is to prevent conversion of youthful offenders into abdurate criminals as a result of their association with hardened criminals of mature age in case the youthful offenders are sentenced to undergo imprisonment in jail.
Karnataka High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - H P Sandesh - Full Document

Gangoji Rao Salanke vs State on 24 September, 1992

In State of Karnataka v. Harijan Dharma and Anr., 1992(2) KLJ 85 the benefit of the Act was extended to the accused as he was found guilty of the offence falling under Section 304 Part II I.P.C. and the facts of the case were that the blow intended by the accused to stab another, fell on the deceased. In view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, the Court extended the benefit of the Act to the accused.
Karnataka High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1