Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 127 (0.86 seconds)
Documents citing Deputy Commissioner, Hardoi vs Rama Krishna Narain And Others on 8 October, 1953

Parmeshwari Asnani vs State (Education Department)Ors on 28 August, 2017

In Deputy Commissioner, Hardoi Vs. Rama Krishna (supra), it was held that eventual interest of a party in the fruits of litigation cannot be held to be a true test of impleading parties according to Civil Procedure Code. Due to difference in the facts and circumstances, the case law cited by learned counsel for the respondents, has no application in the present case.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

S.P. Gupta & Ors. vs . M/S Pal & Associates Pvt. Ltd. on 17 November, 2011

12 Although, management of defendant No.1 has taken over the company in 2003, yet the liability and rights of predecessor company are also transferred to it. 13 In view of the observations made above and the law laid down in Dy. Commissioner Vs. Rama Krishna,AIR 1953 SC 521 and Hardeva Vs Ismail, 1954 SCR 506, in my considered opinion, defendant No.1 is a necessary to the present suit. The application of the defendant filed under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC is accordingly dismissed.
Delhi District Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Trivedi Kalidas Umiyashankar vs Lr Of Decd Thakor Fakirji Mafaji on 15 September, 2023

In Dy. Commr. v. Rama Krishna Narain [1954 SCR 506 : AIR 1953 SC Page 65 of 70 Downloaded on : Sat Sep 16 17:21:19 IST 2023 NEUTRAL CITATION C/SA/15/2023 CAV JUDGMENT DATED: 15/09/2023 undefined 521] also it was held that a question of law of importance to the parties was a substantial question of law entitling the appellant to a certificate under (the then) Section 100 CPC.
Gujarat High Court Cites 31 - Cited by 0 - B D Karia - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next