Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.28 seconds)

The Special Land Acquisition Officer, ... vs Bhogilal Lalchand Gujarati on 27 April, 1970

The third decision on which the learned Government Pleader relied was the decision in the case of K. M. K. B. M. K. Chettyar Firm v. The Secretary of State for India (1933) I.L.R. 11 Rang. 344 where the proposition is laid down (at p. 350) that the Court cannot direct, when the Collector has paid out money under Section 31, that he should again pay out the same sum to someone else. If the judgment in the said case is perused carefully it, however, shows (at pp. 348-349) that there was no dispute before the Collector as to title to receive compensation and it was, therefore, held that, under the provisions of Clause (1) of Section 31, the Collector was bound to pay the money to the person who was entitled to the same under the award made by him.
Bombay High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1