Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.26 seconds)

Mohammad Ahmad vs Reliance General Insurance Co.Ltd. on 5 December, 2017

15. This Commission in Appeal No.FA/2014/459 - Pushpendra Pillewar Vs. Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. and Another, vide order dated 27.03.2015, on the basis of judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Nitin Khandelwal, IV (2008) CPJ 1 (SC), judgments of Hon'ble National Commission in Baljeet Vs. United India Insurance Company Limited (2014) 1 CPR 61 (NC), National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Kamal Singha, IV (2010) CPJ 297 (NC), has awarded compensation to the complainant on non-standard basis. The O.P. No.1 Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd., filed Revision Petition No.1616 of 2015 before Hon'ble National Commission against the order dated 27.03.2015 of this Commission. Vide order dated 04.10.2017, Hon'ble National Commission allowed the Revision Petition and set aside the order passed by this Commission, observing thus :-
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Royal Sundaram Allianz Insurance ... vs Umesh Kumar Verma on 15 December, 2017

19. This Commission in Appeal No.FA/2014/459 - Pushpendra Pillewar Vs. Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. and Another, vide order dated 27.03.2015, on the basis of judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Nitin Khandelwal, IV (2008) CPJ 1 (SC), judgments of Hon'ble National Commission in Baljeet Vs. United India Insurance Company Limited (2014) 1 CPR 61 (NC), National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Kamal Singha, IV (2010) CPJ 297 (NC), has awarded compensation to the complainant on non-standard basis. The O.P. No.1 Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd., filed Revision Petition No.1616 of 2015 before Hon'ble National Commission against the order dated 27.03.2015 of this Commission. Vide order dated 04.10.2017, Hon'ble National Commission allowed the Revision Petition and set aside the order passed by this Commission, observing thus :-
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1