Vinod Chander vs Ishwar Dayal on 14 October, 2004
20. There is no gainsaying that subsequent events can be taken into consideration and as of date the children of the family are grown up, of marriageable age, besides the petitioner and his wife are also close to retirement would certainly need more accommodation than is presently available with them. Reference may be had to Freddy Fernandes Vs. P.L.Mehra [ 1973 RCR 53 (59)]; Shri Sain Das Berry Vs. Shri Madan Lal Puri, 1971 RCR (887); M/s Tin Containers Vs. Kanwar Bhan Wadhwa [ 1972 (2) RCR (4) Delhi]; Anand Gopal Jhingan Vs. K.D.Beri [ 1996 RLR 36]; Amrit Lal Vs. Jagpal Singh [1996 RLR 392 (395, para 10 and 12]; Dev Raj Bajaj Vs. R.K.Khanna [1996 RLR 125].