Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (1.16 seconds)

Redex Protech Ltd.,, Ahmedabad. vs Department Of Income Tax

3. Kisan Discretionary Family Trust Vs .Assistant Commissioner of Income- tax[2008] 113 TTJ 918(AHD) ( ITAT, AHMEDABAD 'A' BENCH) Coming to the first finding that after offering income in the revised return, which was not withdrawn by the appellant, it is respectfully submitted that the fact that appellant has offered income in the revised return of income cannot preclude and appellant can raise such contentions before learned CIT(A) or before Hon'ble Tribunal. At the outset it is submitted that the income was offered in the revised return on a "without prejudice" basis.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shiv Discretionary Family Trust, ... vs Assessee on 29 September, 2015

4.7 Before us, learned Authorized Representative submitted that under facts and circumstances, CIT(A) grossly erred that assessee is not entitled to interest on refund of Rs.40,442/- and eligibility for interest on refund of Rs.11,138/- as raised by ground no.2 & 3 before us. He pointed out that this issue is covered in favour of assessee in case of similarly placed trust i.e. Vaibhavi Discretionary Family Trust vs. ITO 12(2)(1) and other appeals by ITAT 'F' Mumbai Bench by observing as under:
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1