Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.35 seconds)

Om Prakash Yadav vs State Of U.P. Through ... on 24 May, 2024

7. Since the aforesaid order of termination of the services of the petitioner was set aside and with regard to the approval of the termination order and payment of arrears of salary, the matter was remitted to the Basic Shiksha Adhikari. On the representation made by the petitioner in the light of the aforesaid judgement dated 16.1.2013, the Basic Shiksha Adhikari considered the claim of the petitioner with regard to payment of arrears of salary and having found that the petitioner was absent from the Institution from 8.9.1986 till the date of his termination without any application or without any reason and no explanation for the same was provided by the petitioner, therefore, the claim of the petitioner for arrears of salary has been denied vide order dated 7.11.2013 relying upon the principle of no work no pay. Being aggrieved by the aforesaid order dated 7.11.2013 passed by the Basic Shiksha Adhikari, the petitioner filed another Writ Petition A No. 6830 of 2014 (Om Prakash Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and others) which was allowed vide judgement and order dated 5.2.2014 and the matter was remitted back to the Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Azamgarh to take a fresh decision in the matter considering the various objections raised by the petitioner in the writ petition. Against the aforesaid order dated 5.2.2014, the Committee of Management of the said Institution filed a Special Appeal No. 245 of 2014. During the pendency of the said special appeal the Basic Shiksha Adhikari has passed an order on 30.8.2014 restoring the services of the petitioner. Subsequently, the said special appeal has been dismissed on 19.2.2016 in the light of the order dated 30.8.2014 passed by the Basic Shiksha Adhikari. The relevant portion of the order dated 30.8.2014 is being quoted as under:
Allahabad High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - M C Tripathi - Full Document

Om Prakash Yadav vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 18 May, 2026

4. Aggrieved by the order dated 23.11.2023, the petitioner filed Criminal Revision No. 213 of 2025 (Om Prakash Yadav vs. State of U.P.). The said criminal revision was also dismissed on 14.12.2023, upholding the findings recorded by the District Magistrate in the order dated 23.11.2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that both the courts have committed gross illegality in denying the release of the petitioner's vehicle in his favour.
Allahabad High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Santosh Kumar Rai vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others on 23 August, 2024

4. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed off, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit with a direction upon respondent no. 3, District Inspector of Schools, Deoria, to take decision in the matter, in accordance with law in the light of decision of this Court in case of Om Prakash Yadav (Supra), preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
Allahabad High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - R R Agarwal - Full Document

Digvijay Singh Yadav vs State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. ... on 15 July, 2025

Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the respondents have failed to count the services of the petitioner for the purpose of fixation of his pay scale from the date of final selection and appointment of the selected candidates in terms of the Advertisement No. 01/2009 considering the judgment of this Court passed in Writ-A No. 17329 of 2012 Inre; Om Prakash Yadav Vs. State of U.P and Ors decided on 23.02.2018.
Allahabad High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - A Moin - Full Document
1