citedby: 162183589

Radhika Kushwaha & Others vs State Of U.P. on 27 August, 2014

Similarly In A.I.R. 2002 Supreme Court 107 in the case of Munni Devi Vs. State of Rajasthan and others it was held by Hon'ble Apex Court that "while exercising the revisional power the High Court has no authority to re-appreciate the evidence in the manner as the trial court and appellate courts are required to do".

Allahabad High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 2 - R Pandya - Full Document

Phool Sahai & Others vs State Of U.P. on 27 August, 2014

Similarly In A.I.R. 2002 Supreme Court 107 in the case of Munni Devi Vs. State of Rajasthan and others it was held by Hon'ble Apex Court that "while exercising the revisional power the High Court has no authority to re-appreciate the evidence in the manner as the trial court and appellate courts are required to do".

Allahabad High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - R Pandya - Full Document

Smt. Fatma Begum vs State Of U.P. & Another on 11 August, 2014

Similarly In A.I.R. 2002 Supreme Court 107 in the case of Munni Devi Vs. State of Rajasthan and others it was held by Hon'ble Apex Court that "while exercising the revisional power the High Court has no authority to re-appreciate the evidence in the manner as the trial court and appellate courts are required to do".

Allahabad High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - R Pandya - Full Document

Ram Chander And (3) Ors. vs State Of U.P. on 16 September, 2016

Similarly In A.I.R. 2002 Supreme Court 107 in the case of Munni Devi Vs. State of Rajasthan and others it was held by Hon'ble Apex Court has held:-

Allahabad High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - R Pandya - Full Document

Vikas Mall vs State Of U.P. & Another on 7 November, 2014

Similarly In A.I.R. 2002 Supreme Court 107 in the case of Munni Devi Vs. State of Rajasthan and others it was held by Hon'ble Apex Court that "while exercising the revisional power the High Court has no authority to re-appreciate the evidence in the manner as the trial court and appellate courts are required to do".

Allahabad High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - R Pandya - Full Document

Con. Lal Channd Gla vs State Of U.P. on 10 September, 2014

Similarly in A.I.R. 2002 Supreme Court 107 in the case of Munni Devi Vs. State of Rajasthan and others it was held by Hon'ble Apex Court that "while exercising the revisional power the High Court has no authority to re-appreciate the evidence in the manner as the trial court and appellate courts are required to do".

Allahabad High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - R Pandya - Full Document

Devendra Kumar vs State Of U.P. on 12 September, 2014

Similarly In A.I.R. 2002 Supreme Court 107 in the case of Munni Devi Vs. State of Rajasthan and others it was held by Hon'ble Apex Court that "while exercising the revisional power the High Court has no authority to re-appreciate the evidence in the manner as the trial court and appellate courts are required to do".

Allahabad High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - R Pandya - Full Document

Smt. Ramawati Devi And 2 Others vs State Of U.P. And Anr. on 5 August, 2014

Similarly In A.I.R. 2002 Supreme Court 107 in the case of Munni Devi Vs. State of Rajasthan and others it was held by Hon'ble Apex Court that "while exercising the revisional power the High Court has no authority to re-appreciate the evidence in the manner as the trial court and appellate courts are required to do".

Allahabad High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - R Pandya - Full Document

Amar Singh And Anr. vs State Of U.P. And Anr. on 8 August, 2014

Similarly In A.I.R. 2002 Supreme Court 107 in the case of Munni Devi Vs. State of Rajasthan and others it was held by Hon'ble Apex Court that "while exercising the revisional power the High Court has no authority to re-appreciate the evidence in the manner as the trial court and appellate courts are required to do".

Allahabad High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - R Pandya - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results