Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.28 seconds)
Documents citing R A No. 69 Of 2022 In Appeal No. 196 Of 2022 ... vs Sebi on 21 November, 2022

Sourav Nursing Home Pvt. Ltd. vs Sebi on 16 April, 2024

The other appellants, Arrowline Distributors Pvt. Ltd. vs SEBI in Appeal No. 220 of 2024, Metrocity Suppliers Pvt. Ltd. vs SEBI in Appeal No. 221 of 2024, Sourav Nursing Home Pvt. Ltd. vs SEBI in Appeal No. 222 of 2024, Sourav Builders Pvt. Ltd. vs SEBI in Appeal No. 223 of 2024 and Sourav Management Pvt. Ltd. vs SEBI in Appeal No. 224 of 2024 have pleaded that the impugned trades fall in the same category as that of 27 other entities who have been issued administrative warning. Considering the same, interim relief is allowed to these entities. The appellants are directed to deposit a sum of Rs. 2.50 lakhs each before the respondent within two weeks from today. If the same amount is deposited, no further coercive action will be taken by the respondent.
Securities Appellate Tribunal Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Metrocity Suppliers Pvt. Ltd. vs Sebi on 16 April, 2024

The other appellants, Arrowline Distributors Pvt. Ltd. vs SEBI in Appeal No. 220 of 2024, Metrocity Suppliers Pvt. Ltd. vs SEBI in Appeal No. 221 of 2024, Sourav Nursing Home Pvt. Ltd. vs SEBI in Appeal No. 222 of 2024, Sourav Builders Pvt. Ltd. vs SEBI in Appeal No. 223 of 2024 and Sourav Management Pvt. Ltd. vs SEBI in Appeal No. 224 of 2024 have pleaded that the impugned trades fall in the same category as that of 27 other entities who have been issued administrative warning. Considering the same, interim relief is allowed to these entities. The appellants are directed to deposit a sum of Rs. 2.50 lakhs each before the respondent within two weeks from today. If the same amount is deposited, no further coercive action will be taken by the respondent.
Securities Appellate Tribunal Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Arrowline Distributors Pvt. Ltd. vs Sebi on 16 April, 2024

The other appellants, Arrowline Distributors Pvt. Ltd. vs SEBI in Appeal No. 220 of 2024, Metrocity Suppliers Pvt. Ltd. vs SEBI in Appeal No. 221 of 2024, Sourav Nursing Home Pvt. Ltd. vs SEBI in Appeal No. 222 of 2024, Sourav Builders Pvt. Ltd. vs SEBI in Appeal No. 223 of 2024 and Sourav Management Pvt. Ltd. vs SEBI in Appeal No. 224 of 2024 have pleaded that the impugned trades fall in the same category as that of 27 other entities who have been issued administrative warning. Considering the same, interim relief is allowed to these entities. The appellants are directed to deposit a sum of Rs. 2.50 lakhs each before the respondent within two weeks from today. If the same amount is deposited, no further coercive action will be taken by the respondent.
Securities Appellate Tribunal Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Gokul Solutions Ltd. vs Sebi on 16 April, 2024

The other appellants, Arrowline Distributors Pvt. Ltd. vs SEBI in Appeal No. 220 of 2024, Metrocity Suppliers Pvt. Ltd. vs SEBI in Appeal No. 221 of 2024, Sourav Nursing Home Pvt. Ltd. vs SEBI in Appeal No. 222 of 2024, Sourav Builders Pvt. Ltd. vs SEBI in Appeal No. 223 of 2024 and Sourav Management Pvt. Ltd. vs SEBI in Appeal No. 224 of 2024 have pleaded that the impugned trades fall in the same category as that of 27 other entities who have been issued administrative warning. Considering the same, interim relief is allowed to these entities. The appellants are directed to deposit a sum of Rs. 2.50 lakhs each before the respondent within two weeks from today. If the same amount is deposited, no further coercive action will be taken by the respondent.
Securities Appellate Tribunal Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1