citedby: 1624374

"25. The equality clause enshrined in Article 16 mandates that every appointment to public posts or office should be made by open advertisement so as to enable all eligible persons to compete for selection on merit-Umesh Kumar Nagpal v. State of Haryana [(1994) 4 SCC 138], UPSC v. Girish Jayanti Lal Vaghela [(2006) 2 SCC 482], State of Manipur v. Y. Token Singh [(2007) 5 SCC 65] and Municipal Corpn., Hyderabad v. P. Mary Manoranjani [(2008) 2 SCC 758]. Although, the Courts have carved out some exceptions to this rule, for example, compassionate appointment of the dependent of deceased employees, for the purpose of this case it is not necessary to elaborate that aspect.

Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The counsel has sought to place reliance upon Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad and others and J.C. Yadav and others (supra) to drive home the point that where relaxation has been given for extraneous reasons against rules, the same can be withdrawn by the authorities.

Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - F D Singh - Full Document

"13. The equality clause enshrined in Article 16 mandates that every appointment to public posts or office should be made by open advertisement so as to enable all eligible persons to compete for selection on merit Umesh Kumar Nagpal v. State of Haryana and Ors. ; Union Public Service Commission v. Girish Jayanti Lal Vaghela ; State of Manipur and Ors. v. Y. Token Singh and Ors. and Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad and Ors. v. P. Mary Manoranjani and Anr. . Although, the Courts have carved out some exceptions to this rule, for example, compassionate appointment of the dependent of deceased employees, for the purpose of this case it is not necessary to elaborate that aspect."

Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Y. Token Singh and others [(2007) 5 SCC 65] and Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad and others v. P. Mary Manoranjani and another [(2008) 2 SCC 758]. Although, the Courts have carved out some exceptions to this rule, for example, compassionate appointment of the dependent of deceased employees, for the purpose of this case it is not necessary to elaborate that aspect."

Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 10 - S Vaidya - Full Document

Y. Token Singh and others [(2007) 5 SCC 65] and Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad and others v. P. Mary Manoranjani and another [(2008) 2 SCC 758]. Although, the Courts have carved out some exceptions to this rule, for example, compassionate appointment of the dependent of deceased employees, for the purpose of this case it is not necessary to elaborate that aspect."

Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - S Vaidya - Full Document

Y. Token Singh and others [(2007) 5 SCC 65] and Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad and others v. P. Mary Manoranjani and another [(2008) 2 SCC 758]. Although, the Courts have carved out some exceptions to this rule, for example, compassionate appointment of the dependent of deceased employees, for the purpose of this case it is not necessary to elaborate that aspect."

Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - S Vaidya - Full Document

Y. Token Singh and others [(2007) 5 SCC 65] and Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad and others v. P. Mary Manoranjani and another [(2008) 2 SCC 758]. Although, the Courts have carved out some exceptions to this rule, for example, compassionate appointment of the dependent of deceased employees, for the purpose of this case it is not necessary to elaborate that aspect."

Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - S Vaidya - Full Document

Y. Token Singh and others [(2007) 5 SCC 65] and Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad and others v. P. Mary Manoranjani and another [(2008) 2 SCC 758]. Although, the Courts have carved out some exceptions to this rule, for example, compassionate appointment of the dependent of deceased employees, for the purpose of this case it is not necessary to elaborate that aspect."

Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - S Vaidya - Full Document

Y. Token Singh and others [(2007) 5 SCC 65] and Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad and others v. P. Mary Manoranjani and another [(2008) 2 SCC 758]. Although, the Courts have carved out some exceptions to this rule, for example, compassionate appointment of the dependent of deceased employees, for the purpose of this case it is not necessary to elaborate that aspect."

Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - S Vaidya - Full Document

Y. Token Singh and others [(2007) 5 SCC 65] and Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad and others v. P. Mary Manoranjani and another [(2008) 2 SCC 758]. Although, the Courts have carved out some exceptions to this rule, for example, compassionate appointment of the dependent of deceased employees, for the purpose of this case it is not necessary to elaborate that aspect."

Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - S Vaidya - Full Document

Search Results Page