Prem Prakash vs . Heena Bhasin on 5 July, 2023
13. As per the arguments led by the Ld. Counsel for accused, that
there is no loan transaction between complainant and accused at
any point of time. It has been further argued, that there has been
no mentioning in the complaint regarding issuance of two legal
notices to accused, one in month of February and another in
April, 2021, which makes the present matter barred by limitation.
To support his arguments, he has relied upon the judgement in
case of "Indrapuram Habitat Centre Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs.
Stup Consultants Pvt. Ltd- that Once cause of action for filing
a complaint has arisen, the subsequent re-presentation of cheque
and its dishonourment would not give rise to a fresh cause of
action for filing a complaint under Section 142(b) of the Act".