Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 508 (1.54 seconds)
Documents citing Suresh Koshy George vs The University Of Kerala & Ors on 15 July, 1968

Padmanabhan vs Kerala State Handloom Development ... on 24 June, 1992

But both rulings accept-referring to Suresh Koshy George's case and Associated Cement Co. Ltd. 's case, that a second opportunity at the stage of punishment is not part of the law of the land and is not a necessary requirement of principles of natural justice. Even a single opportunity could be excluded if there was nexus with the object of the statutory or rule provision in a given distinct class of cases and this is not violative of Article 14. This is so even though principles of natural justice are a facet of Article 14.
Kerala High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 4 - M J Rao - Full Document

President, Pudupariyaram Service ... vs Rugmini Amma And Ors. on 14 November, 1995

Though the case related to the original Clause (2) of Article 311 the same applies to the present Clause (2) of Article 311 except for the fact that now a Government servant has no right to make any representation against the penalty proposed to be imposed upon him, but as pointed out earlier, in the case of Suresh Koshy George v. University of Kerala (supra) such an opportunity is not the requirement of the principles of natural justice and as held in Associated Cement Companies Ltd v. T.C. Shrivastava (supra) neither the ordinary law of the land nor industrial law requires such an opportunity to be given.
Kerala High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 17 - K T Thomas - Full Document

S. Kannan vs State Bank Of India on 28 November, 1989

As observed by this Court in Suresh Koshy George v. The University of Kerala . The rules of Natural Justice are not embodied rules. What particular rule of Natural Justice should apply to a given case must depend to a great extent on the facts and circumstances of that case, the framework of the law under which the enquiry is held and the constitution of the Tribunal or body of persons appointed for that purpose. Whenever a complaint is made before a court that some principle of Natural Justice had been contravened, the court has to decide whether the observance of that rule was necessary for a just decision on the facts of the case.
Madras High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - M Srinivasan - Full Document

Chandrika Pradhan vs State Of Orissa & Others on 3 April, 2024

- http://indiankanoon.org/doc/136770833/ 6 administrative enquiry may have more far reaching effect than a decision in a quasijudicial enquiry. As observed by this Court in Suresh Koshy George v. University of Kerala the rules of natural justice are not embodied rules. What particular rule of natural justice should apply to a given case must depend to a great extent on the facts and circumstances of that case, the framework of the law under which the enquiry is held and the constitution of the Tribunal or body of persons appointed for that purpose. Whenever a complaint is made before a court that some principle of natural justice had been contravened the court has to decide whether the observance of that rule was necessary for a just decision on the facts of that case.
Orissa High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - B P Satapathy - Full Document

Bablu Bhatra & Others vs State Of Odisha & Others .... Opposite ... on 28 August, 2024

As observed by this Court in Suresh Koshy George v. University of Kerala the rules of natural justice are not embodied rules. What particular rule of natural justice should apply to a given case must depend to a great extent on the facts and circumstances of that case, the framework of the law under which the enquiry is held and the constitution of the Tribunal or body of persons appointed for that purpose. Whenever a complaint is made before a court that some principle of natural justice had been contravened the court has to decide whether the observance of that rule was necessary for a just decision on the facts of that case.
Orissa High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - B P Satapathy - Full Document

Dr. Binodini Das vs State Of Odisha & Others on 3 January, 2024

As observed by this Court in Suresh Koshy George v. University of Kerala the rules of natural justice are not embodied rules. What particular rule of natural justice should apply to a given case must depend to a great extent on the facts and circumstances of that case, the framework of the law under which the enquiry is held and the constitution of the Tribunal or body of persons appointed for that purpose. Whenever a complaint is made before a court that some principle of natural justice had been contravened the court has to decide whether the observance of that rule was necessary for a just decision on the facts of that case.
Orissa High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - B P Satapathy - Full Document

Ved Prakash Malhotra vs State Bank Of India And Anr. on 26 November, 1973

(Suresh Koshy George v. University of Kerala, 1969 1 Scr 317, and the decisions cited therein). On the other hand, it has been repeatedly asserted that there is no implied duty in English law to give reasons for a decision even by a quasi-judicial authority. C.S.A. de Smith-judicial Review of Administrative Action, Second Edition, pages 29, 133, 179 and 313). Professor Smith has pointed out that only in one limited class of cases, such an implied duty to give reasons has been recognised. Licensing justices empowered to refuse legal licenses on four specified grounds could be compelled by mandamus to hear and determine the applications "according to law" (Smith, op Commissioner of Income Tax 133).
Delhi High Court Cites 56 - Cited by 9 - Full Document

Kumari Manasi Seth vs State Of Odisha & Ors. .... Opposite ... on 19 February, 2024

As observed by this Court in Suresh Koshy George v. University of Kerala the rules of natural justice are not embodied rules. What particular rule of natural justice should apply to a given case must depend to a great extent on the facts and circumstances of that case, the framework of the law under which the enquiry is held and the constitution of the Tribunal or body of persons appointed for that purpose. Whenever a complaint is made before a court that some principle of natural justice had been contravened the court has to decide whether the observance of that rule was necessary for a just decision on the facts of that case.
Orissa High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - B P Satapathy - Full Document

Ananda Kumar Panda vs State Of Odisha & Others on 15 March, 2024

As observed by this Court in Suresh Koshy George v. University of Kerala the rules of natural justice are not embodied Page 7 of 10 // 8 // rules. What particular rule of natural justice should apply to a given case must depend to a great extent on the facts and circumstances of that case, the framework of the law under which the enquiry is held and the constitution of the Tribunal or body of persons appointed for that purpose. Whenever a complaint is made before a court that some principle of natural justice had been contravened the court has to decide whether the observance of that rule was necessary for a just decision on the facts of that case.
Orissa High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - B P Satapathy - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next