Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 345 (0.37 seconds)Documents citing
Laxman vs State Of M.P on 18 September, 2006
Laxman vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 23 May, 2019
(Virender Singh)
Vacation Judge
mk
MUKTA
KAUSHAL
2019.05.24
14:45:07 -07'00'
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT INDORE
M.Cr.C No.21270/2019(Laxman Vs. State of M.P.)
Laxman vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 27 September, 2019
Any default on behalf of applicant in plantation or caring of
4
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.40111/2019
(Laxman Vs. State of M.P.)
trees shall disentitle the applicant from enjoying the benefit of bail.
Ranthu Oraon vs State Of West Bengal on 6 August, 2019
Mr. Partha Sarathi Bhattacharyya, learned advocate appearing for the appellant
argued that the place of occurrence has not been specifically established. Most of the
prosecution witnesses including the de-facto complainant (PW1) did not specifically state
3
the place of occurrence. Weapon of offence was not seized from the appellant who was
apprehended at the spot. The incident occurred in the dark and there was no light to
identify who had shot the arrow at the deceased. Torch lights were not seized in course of
investigation. Without prejudice to the aforesaid submission, it was argued that the
appellant had no intention to kill the victim and had indiscriminately shot arrows as he had
been surrounded by a large group of persons and apprehended that he would be
manhandled by them. Hence, conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code
ought to be converted to one punishable under Section 304 of the Indian Penal Code. He
relied on Laxman vs. State of M.P. reported in (2006) 11 SCC 316.
Laxman vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 4 November, 2020
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
3 M.Cr.C.No.42235/2020
(Laxman Vs. State of M.P.)
Laxman vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 7 November, 2020
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH,
BENCH AT GWALIOR
WP No 2756/2020
( Laxman Vs The State of M.P. & others)
(3)
If any arrears are worked out, the same shall be paid as
expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of three
months.
Laxman vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 8 July, 2019
7. The appellant shall mark his presence before the
concerned police station/ Investigating Officer on every
3
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.5595/2019
(Laxman Vs. State of M.P. & another)
Monday between 10:00 AM to 2:00 PM till filing of the charge-
Laxman vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 16 August, 2021
5. The applicant will not seek unnecessary adjournments during the
trial; and
3
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.40519/2021
(Laxman vs. State of M.P.)
Ravi Shakya vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 20 March, 2017
It is directed that the applicants Laxman and
Ravi Shakya be released on bail on their
furnishing a personal bond in the sum of
Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty Thousand Only) each
with a surety bond of the same amount each to the
M.Crc.2109/17
(Laxman Vs. State of M.P.)