Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 24 (0.39 seconds)
Documents citing Ashok Kumar Son Of Sh. Charan Dass vs The State Of Haryana Through Land ... on 5 November, 2012

Ashok Kumar Suri And Ors vs State Of Punjab on 12 July, 2018

3. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the instant petition is disposed of with the direction to respondents to consider the case unfolded by the petitioners in their legal notice dated 28.03.2018 (Annexure P-5) and to decide the same, in accordance with instructions dated 14.03.2017 (P-2) issued by the Department of Personnel, Govt. of Punjab as well as in the light of judgment passed by this Court in CWP No. 5956 of 2008, titled as "Charan Dass v. State of Haryana" (P-2), within a period of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - J Singh - Full Document

Kamlesh Kumar And Others vs Punjab School Education Board And Anr on 11 January, 2018

instant petition is disposed of with the direction to respondents to consider the case unfolded by the petitioners in their legal notice dated 10.09.2017 (Annexure P-11) and to decide the same, in accordance with instructions dated 14.03.2017 (P-6) issued by the Department of Personnel, Govt. of Punjab and duly adopted by the respondent-Board as well as in the light of judgment passed by this Court in CWP No. 5956 of 2008, titled as "Charan Dass v. State of Haryana" (P-2), within a period of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - J Singh - Full Document

Raj Kumar Shoor And Ors vs State Of Punjab on 4 May, 2018

instant petition is disposed of with the direction to respondents to consider the case unfolded by the petitioners in their legal notice dated 15.02.2018 (Annexure P-7) and to decide the same, in accordance with instructions dated 14.03.2017 (P-2) issued by the Department of Personnel, Govt. of Punjab as well as in the light of judgment passed by this Court in CWP No. 5956 of 2008, titled as "Charan Dass v. State of Haryana" (P-2), within a period of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - J Singh - Full Document

Kosh Pati Dhawan vs Punjab Water Supply And Sewerage Board ... on 8 December, 2023

In view of the pleadings in the present petition, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case or the claim being made by the petitioner in the representation dated 14.11.2019 (Annexure P-17), respondent No.1 is directed to decide the aforesaid representation in the light of settled proposition of law laid down in case titled CWP-5956 of 2008 titled as Charan Dass Vs. State of Haryana, CWP-17280-2011 titled Prem Kumar Verma and others Vs. State of Haryana, CWP-18307-2011 titled Gurmeet Singh and another Vs. Punjab School Education Board and others, CWP-23674-2016 titled Kulbhushan Gupta Vs. State of Punjab, and CWP-21527-2014 titled Jai Singh Kadian and others Vs. State of Haryana and aother by passing a speaking order within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Naresh Kumar vs State Of Haryana And Others on 20 February, 2025

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner contends that Sh. Ratti Bhan Chopra cannot be granted accelerated seniority over and above the petitioner and that on being promoted to the post of Accountant, the petitioner was to be placed above Sh. Ratti Bhan Chopra. He further contends that the issue as regards scale of pay to be commensurate with the seniority came up before this Court in CWP-5956-2008 titled as 'Charan Dass vs. State of Haryana', which was decided in favour of the petitioner therein vide judgment dated 18.11.2008. In compliance thereto, the State of Haryana issued instructions dated 05.03.2009 and 23.11.2009 for stepping up of pay of senior general category employees at par with the junior counter-parts of reserved category and decided to give the benefit of stepping up of pay to the general category employees. He submits that notwithstanding the petitioner being senior to Sh. Ratti Bhan Chopra, he was 2 of 11 ::: Downloaded on - 08-03-2025 03:55:16 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2025:PHHC:024841 3 112 CWP-35111-2024 (O&M) however, promoted to the post of Accountant on 27.10.2008 and that as per the catch-up Rule, he was required to be given his seniority above Sh. Ratti Bhan Chopra and thereafter to be promoted to the post of Superintendent. He also claimed that the arrears of enhanced pay w.e.f. 25.11.1998 i.e. the date when Sh. Ratti Bhan Chopra was promoted to the post of Accountant be also released to him. Since no action was taken by the respondent(s) on the claim raised by the petitioner, CWP-7422-2016 was filed before this Court, which was disposed of vide order dated 25.04.2016 directing the respondents to take a decision on the legal notice dated 26.11.2015 served by the petitioner.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Avtar Singh And Others vs Punjabi University Patiala And Another on 14 November, 2022

This is a petition that has been filed by the petitioners seeking a direction to the respondents to step up the pay of the petitioners (Senior General Category Employees) at par with their respective Junior Scheduled Caste Category Employees (whom the petitioners have caught up as per Annexure P-1) in accordance with law settled by this Court in CWP No.5956 of 2008 titled as Charan Dass Vs. State of Haryana; CWP No.17280 of 2011 titled as Prem Kumar Verma and others Vs. State of Haryana and CWP No.18307 of 2011 titled as Gurmeet Singh and another Vs. Punjab School Education Board and others as well as the instructions dated 14.03.2017 issued by the Department of Personnel, Govt. of Punjab (duly adopted by the respondent-University vide letter dated 24.01.2018), with all consequential benefits.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - J Thakur - Full Document

Krishan Kumar Sangwan vs State Of Haryana And Another on 11 December, 2012

Reliance has also been placed on the judgment passed by this Court in CWP CWP No. 24506 of 2012 2 No.5956 of 2008 titled as Charan Dass vs. State of Haryana, decided on 18.11.2008 (Annexure P-2) as also the judgment passed by this Court in CWP No.17280 of 2011 titled as Prem Kumar Verma and others vs. State of Haryana, decided on 07.08.2012 (Annexure P-5) wherein the instructions dated 16.3.2006, which granted accelerated seniority to the Scheduled Caste employees as a consequence of promotion under the reservation policy, stand quashed being ultra vires of the Constitution and counter to the dictum in M.Nagaraj vs. Union of India, (2006) 8 SCC 212 with a further prayer that the petitioner be granted the consequential benefits of stepping up of his pay equal to that of his junior respondent No.2-Ajit Singh, Assistant, who had been promoted prior to the petitioner despite he being junior only on the basis of accelerated promotion as he belongs to the reserved category whereas the petitioner belongs to the General Category.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - A G Masih - Full Document

Chanchal Sethi And Others vs State Of Haryana And Others on 6 February, 2014

Petitioners have approached this Court, praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to grant them benefit of stepping up of their pay at par with their juniors in accordance with letters dated 27.11.2006, 5.3.2009 and 23.11.2009 (Annexures P-3, P-6 and P-13 respectively). Reliance has also been placed upon the judgements passed by this Court in Civil Writ Petition No.5956 of 2008 (Charan Dass Vs. State of Haryana), decided on 18.11.2008 and Civil Writ Petition No.21607 of 2010 (Madan Lal Jindal Vs. State of Haryana and others), decided on 24.9.2012. The petitioners have also prayed for consequential benefits.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A G Masih - Full Document

Krishan Singh And Others vs State Of Haryana And Others on 6 February, 2014

Petitioners have approached this Court, praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to grant them benefit of stepping up of their pay at par with their juniors in accordance with letters dated 27.11.2006, 5.3.2009 and 23.11.2009 (Annexures P-3, P-6 and P-13 respectively). Reliance has also been placed upon the judgements passed by this Court in Civil Writ Petition No.5956 of 2008 (Charan Dass Vs. State of Haryana), decided on 18.11.2008 and Civil Writ Petition No.21607 of 2010 (Madan Lal Jindal Vs. State of Haryana and others), decided on 24.9.2012. The petitioners have also prayed for consequential benefits.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A G Masih - Full Document
1   2 3 Next