Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.40 seconds)
Documents citing Prabhu Narayan & Ors. vs State Of U.P. & Others on 27 January, 2010

WP(C)/5328/2021 on 30 January, 2026

While the earlier judgments rendered by the apex Court as for instance in Prabhu Narain and Ors. Vs. State of U.P and Ors., reported in (2004) 13 SCC 662 had clearly held that claims of regularization and consequential retiral benefits cannot be entertained in the absence of proper procedure for recruitment and also the engagements or employments being against sanction posts; the recent judgments, as discussed above has taken a serious note of the exploitation of the citizens working or rendering long and consistent years of services under the Government departments and who are ultimately deprived of pension.
Gauhati High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - S Saikia - Full Document

State Of U.P. Thru Secy. Lok Nirman & 6 ... vs Sanju Lal & 14 Ors. on 2 August, 2019

4. Vide the impugned order, the learned Single Judge has granted the same relief as given by virtue of judgment dated 06.05.2005 rendered in Writ Petition No.5505 (SS) of 1999 titled 'Prabhu Narain Sharma and others vs. State of U.P. and others'. Consequently, the respondents/writ petitioners have been held entitled to payment of dearness allowance, although they were serving as work charged employees in various departments.
Allahabad High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 4 - Full Document

Azad Singh S/O Jodha Singh vs State Of U.P. Thru Prin. Secy. P.W.D. & ... on 29 January, 2010

It is also admitted to the learned counsel for the parties that against judgement rendered in the case of Prabhu Narain Sharma (supra) Special Appeal was filed wherein the interim relief application was rejected against which Special Leave Petition No. 3661 of 2007 was preferred which was also dismissed by the Apex Court. Thus, the submission is that the controversy involved in this petition has been resolved with respect to the employees of the Corporation and the State government and in view of the settled proposition of law the petition deserves to be allowed. In view of the above observations, this court is of the view that the matters stand finally resolved by this court as well as by the Apex court to the effect that there can be no ceiling limit imposed on payment of dearness allowance to the employees of the corporation and the state government.
Allahabad High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - S Hasnain - Full Document
1