Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.26 seconds)
Documents citing Shravan Ram And 5 Ors. vs State Of Rajasthan on 22 August, 2001

Smt. Kanija And Ors. vs State Of Rajasthan And Anr. on 11 September, 2002

In another decision in Shravan v. State of Raj. and Ors., WLR 1998 Raj. 423, where the petitioner was retired from service and his pension was also fixed and later on the Department felt that by mistake he was wrongly paid more amount by way of pension and the Department passed order for recovery of excess payment from the gratuity of the petitioner without giving an opportunity of hearing and in such circumstances, this Court set aside the order of recovery holding that such recovery order could have not been passed without extending opportunity of hearing.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Narain Lal vs State Of Rajasthan And Ors. on 4 February, 2003

In another decision in Shravan v. State of Raj. and Ors. (6), where the petitioner was retired from service and his pension was also fixed and later on the Department felt that by mistake he was wrongly paid more amount by way of pension and the Department passed order for recovery of excess payment from the gratuity of the petitioner without giving an opportunity of hearing and in such circumstances, this Court set aside the order of recovery holding that such recovery order could have not been passed without extending opportunity of hearing.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Goverdhan Lal vs State Of Rajasthan And Ors. on 24 July, 2003

In another decision in Shravan v. State of Raj. and Ors. (6), where the petitioner was retired from service and his pension was also fixed and later on the Department felt that by mistake he was wrongly paid more amount by way of pension and the Department passed order for recovery of excess payment from the gratuity of the petitioner without giving an opportunity of hearing and in such circumstances, this Court set aside the order of recovery holding that such recovery order could have not been passed without extending opportunity of hearing.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 8 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1