Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 1750 (2.93 seconds)
Documents citing State Of Orissa & Anr vs Mamata Mohanty on 9 February, 2011

State vs . on 30 April, 2012

6. Ld. Counsel for the accused has argued that there was no ill-intention on the part of the accused when he extended his helping hand to the prosecutrix as he was only trying to help an abandoned child on the street and as such a help on the part of the accused cannot make him S.C. No.130/10 FIR No. 133/08 State vs. Vijay Mohanty 4 /10 guilty of the offence of kidnapping under Section 363 IPC.
Delhi District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Narendra Tripathi vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 2 July, 2024

In the considered view of this Court, although, terminating the services of petitioner after rendering long period for almost 25 years is no doubt a great hardship to the petitioner and this Court has great sympathy but the existing legal 28 W.P. No.5604 of 2024 position rule over the sympathy in view of the aforesaid rulings of Supreme Court and the view taken therein and in view of the observations made in Mamata Mohanty (supra) which is as under :-
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 49 - Cited by 0 - S Dwivedi - Full Document

Dr. Jaya Thakur vs Government Of India on 30 January, 2026

In the case of State of Orissa v. Mamata Mohanty, reported in (2011) 3 SCC 436, the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that standard of teaching shall not suffer on the ground of want of funds/paucity of funds cannot be a ground for the State for not maintaining the standard of education and not providing quality education to its citizens. In Paragraph No. 33 of the said decision, the Hon'ble Supreme Court held thus:— W.P. (C) No. 1000 of 2022 Page 109 of 126 “33. In view of the above, it is evident that education is necessary to develop the personality of a person as a whole and in totality as it provides the process of training and acquiring the knowledge, skills, developing mind and character by formal schooling. Therefore, it is necessary to maintain a high academic standard and academic discipline along with academic rigour for the progress of a nation. Democracy depends for its own survival on a high standard of vocational and professional education. Paucity of funds cannot be a ground for the State not to provide quality education to its future citizens. It is for this reason that in order to maintain the standard of education the State Government provides grant-in-aid to private schools to ensure the smooth running of the institution so that the standard of teaching may not suffer for want of funds.” xxx
Supreme Court of India Cites 109 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mrs. R.K. Jodhka & Ors. vs Director Of Education & Ors. on 8 February, 2017

4. Therefore so far as petitioners who are stated in Tables A and B above, since the writ petition has been filed on 12.2.2016, and which is beyond the period of three years of the date of W.P.(C) No.1300/2016 Page 7 of 9 retirement/termination of these petitioners (termination being disputed and the same only being a retirement as per the case of petitioner no.12 and which aspect in any case will not make any difference to result), the ratio of the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Mamta Mohanty (supra) will apply and as also adopted by this Court in the judgments in the cases of Dr. Avtar Singh (supra) and Ms. Preeti Sharma (supra) as reproduced above. The writ petition, so far as petitioners stated in Tables A and B are concerned, is dismissed by applying the doctrine of delay and laches with the underlying principle of limitation.
Delhi High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 2 - V J Mehta - Full Document

Rajendrakumar Amrutbhai Rajguru vs State Of Gujarat on 27 January, 2020

17. Article 14: The petitioners have claimed parity under Article 14 of the Constitution of India. Article 14 of the Constitution of India. The judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in case of State of Orissa and Another v. Mamata Mohanty reported in (2011) 3 SCC 436 is relevant to decide the controversy. In para 56 the Hon'ble Apex Court has observed as under:
Gujarat High Court Cites 30 - Cited by 0 - S R Brahmbhatt - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next