Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.23 seconds)

Quadir Dad Khan vs Unknown on 5 April, 2011

In Pasang Yolmo's case (supra) the Hon'ble Single Bench of this Court while coming to a conclusion that the proceeding before it should be quashed for the ends of justice because of inordinate delay, discussed the decisions in A.R. Antulay (supra), Motilal Sharaf vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir & Anr., reported in (2007)1 SCC (Cr) 180 and P. Ramchandra Rao v. State of Karnataka, reported in JT (2002)4 SC 92. In that case before the Hon'ble Single Judge one prosecution witness was examined and cross-examined in full and the next witness was examined in part. Thereafter, the prosecution failed to bring further witnesses although charge sheet was filed showing 45 number of witnesses. The learned Court found it difficult to accept the fact that the accused was not denied a fair and speedy trial.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - K Chakraborty - Full Document
1