Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (3.48 seconds)
Documents citing Saleem Basha vs Mrs. Mumtaz Begam on 22 April, 1998

A.S. Parveen Akthar vs The Union Of India (Uoi), Represented By ... on 27 December, 2002

In that case also reference was made to the decisions of Justice Beharul Islam of Gauhati High Court in the case of Jiauddin ahmed vs. Anwara Begum, (1981) 1 GLR 358, of Justice Khalid of Kerala High Court in the case of Mohammed Haneefa vs. Pathummal Beevi, 1972 Ker LT 512, of Justice Sidickk of this Court in the case of Saleema Basha vs. Mumtaz Begam, 1998 Cri.
Madras High Court Cites 31 - Cited by 0 - R J Babu - Full Document

Smt. Riaz Fatima And Anr. vs Mohd. Sharif on 20 November, 2006

In case of Salim Basha v. Mumtaz Begam 1991 (1) RCR (Criminal) 392, which was also a case decided by Madras High Court under Section 125 Cr.P.C., the Madras High Court opined that talaq was not valid as no evidence was given to the effect that there was a pre-divorce conference for settlement by two mediators, one chosen by wife and the other by husband which was mandatory of Muslim Law and, therefore, the wife was entitled to maintenance.
Delhi High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 9 - A K Sikri - Full Document

Mohd. Idris vs Smt. Nigar Sultana And Anr. on 11 September, 2002

12. Learned Counsel also read out the statement of DVV-3 Ramchandra Soni who is said to be the scribe of divorce deed (talaknama) Ex. D/l. According to this witness, he had written the contents of Ex. D/l as per the instructions furnished by non-applicant No. 1 wife Nigar Sultana. This Court has gone through the statements of both the parties and the documents and is not impressed by the submissions advanced by the Counsel for the applicant on the basis of aforementioned statements of the witnesses and the contents of application Under Section 125 of the Cr. P.C. as well as the divorce deed Ex. D/l that one can come to the conclusion that reconciliation proceedings had taken place between the applicant and the N.A. No. 1 as mentioned in the judgment of Madras High Court Saleem Basha (supra), and the Divisional Bench of Gauhati High Court in Zeenat Fatema Rashid (supra), which are based on QURANIC LAW and in the reported sayings of prophet (Hadit). No witness of either side or the documents are revealing' this fact that prior to divorce, reconciliation proceedings had taken place between the applicant and the non-application No. 1, after deputing the persons of their own choice from both families.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1