Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (5.68 seconds)
Documents citing Gurubasappa And Ors. vs Gurulingappa on 24 July, 1961

T L Swamy vs Sri M. Shanmugum on 3 March, 2023

In reply to the arguments of the learned counsel appearing for the respondent, the learned counsel appearing for the appellants has relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Gurubasappa and others v. Gurulingappa reported in AIR 1962 MYSURU 246, and brought to the notice of this Court the principles laid down in the judgment with regard to Sections 91 and 92 of the Evidence Act, 1872. The learned counsel also would vehemently contend that Exs.P1 to P3 not stated anything about error in the revenue and survey documents and only the same is created. Hence, it requires interference.
Karnataka High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - H P Sandesh - Full Document

Smt.T.Savithri vs Sri.T.V.Sathyanarayana on 13 March, 2023

20. The counsel for the defendants has also relied on a decision of the Hon'ble High Court reported in AIR 1961 Mys. 878 (Gurubasappa Vs. Gurulingappa) wherein it has been held that intention must be gathered from the document itself in the 1 st place and when the words are express and clear no oral evidence could be admitted in evidence to vary or contradict its terms. However, in the case on hand the plaintiff have been able to show that there is no passing of consideration and when such a plea is taken, it was the responsibility and the burden of the defendants to show that there is passing of consideration.
Bangalore District Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1