Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (2.55 seconds)

Facebook. Inc vs The State Of West Bengal & Anr on 3 January, 2018

21. The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner referred to the decisions reported in Gopalji Prasad vs. State of Sikkim (1981 CRLJ 60), the celebrated judgment in case of Shreya Singhal vs. Union of India (2015) 5 SCC 1. Since the ratio of those judgments are well settled and still holds the field, I do not like to discuss them in detail.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - S Chattopadhyay - Full Document

Abdul Salam vs The State Of Bihar Through District ... on 5 May, 2022

In Gopalji Prasad vs. State of Sikkim and others reported in 1981 CRI.L.J. 60, it was held by the Sikkim High Court that Section 144 Cr.P.C. must recite facts from which satisfaction and opinion of the Magistrate can be inferred and founded. In this particular case, the order dated 18.11.2019 clearly recorded that the opposite Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18197 of 2021 dt.05-05-2022 13/15 party are making construction on the said land as a result of which there is tension and an untoward incident may take place and as such he initiated proceedings section 144 Cr.P.C. Thus, the satisfaction and opinion of the Magistrate can be clearly inferred and founded.
Patna High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - R Roy - Full Document
1