Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.30 seconds)
Documents citing Sri D.L. Sridhar S/O Late D. Lakshmana ... vs Sri C.R. Chandramohan S/O Sri C.Y. ... on 27 March, 2007

Priya Roche vs G R Shet on 13 January, 2021

26. Nextly, though the learned counsel for the appellant places reliance on the judgment passed by this Court in the case 25 of SRI.D.L.SRIDHAR vs. SRI.C.R.CHANDRAMOHAN AND ANOTHER reported in ILR 2008 KAR 591 and in the case of LINGA BHATTA (supra), I have carefully examined the facts of the case in the above mentioned judgments and I do not find any compelling circumstance to accept the law declared by this Court in the aforementioned judgment, as the facts of aforementioned cases are different from the case on hand.
Karnataka High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Poonam Jitendra Jain vs Abhyudaya Co-Operative Bank Ltd. And ... on 24 October, 2018

7] To substantiate this submission, learned counsel for the Appellant has relied upon the judgment of the Karnataka High Court in the case of Sri.D.L. Sridhar Vs. Sri.C.R. Chandramohan & Anr., ILR 2008 KAR 591, wherein the reliance was placed on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of V. Sreedharan Vs. C. Balakrishnan & Anr., 1990(3) SCC 291, in which, it was held that, Contractual obligation created by the pre-attachment document will prevail over the attachment order. It was held that, if the purchaser had already perfected his title, then it has to be held that, that title will prevail over the order of attachment which is passed subsequently.
Bombay High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Poonam Jitendra Jain vs Abhyudaya Co-Operative Bank Ltd. And ... on 24 October, 2018

7] To substantiate this submission, learned counsel for the Appellant has relied upon the judgment of the Karnataka High Court in the case of Sri.D.L. Sridhar Vs. Sri.C.R. Chandramohan & Anr., ILR 2008 KAR 591, wherein the reliance was placed on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of V. Sreedharan Vs. C. Balakrishnan & Anr., 1990(3) SCC 291, in which, it was held that, Contractual obligation created by the pre-attachment document will prevail over the attachment order. It was held that, if the purchaser had already perfected his title, then it has to be held that, that title will prevail over the order of attachment which is passed subsequently.
Bombay High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1