Sh. Satya Pal Gupta vs State on 9 December, 2021
6.2 With the help of judicial precedents, the learned
prosecutor argued that since accused has no right to file any document
at the stage of consideration of charge, claim of the revisionists that
they had a right to first get the cases consolidated is not supported by
any law. It was further argued by the learned p rosecutor that these
revision petitions have been filed by single accused persons in each of
CR No. 54/2021 Satya Pal Gupta vs. State
CR no. 75/2021 Vinod Kumar Bindal vs. State
CR no. 76/2021 S.P. Gupta vs. State
CR no. 77/2021 Vipul Gupta vs. State
page 13 of 44 pages
the cases pending trial and the revisionists do not represent the
remaining accused persons, so this court without hearing the
remaining accused persons ought not to direct that arguments under
Sections 219 & 220 CrPC be heard prior to arguments on charge.