Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.20 seconds)

M/S. Shriram Chits (P) Ltd.,, Hyderabad vs Assessee on 19 March, 2013

11. The next ground (ground No. 4) is with regard to upholding the taxability of foreman dividend at Rs. 8,44,39,492. Brief facts of the issue are that during the assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer found that the above referred dividend income on company's chits was claimed as not taxable in view of the decision of Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court in the case of Soda Silicate and Chemical Works (179 ITR 588). However, the Assessing Officer concluded that the contributors to the chit were not contributors to the mutual society. Besides, the profit arising as dividend on the chit subscribed by the Foreman is not distributed among the subscribers but among the share holders of the assessee company. He further found that Department's contention had been upheld by the Tribunal for Asst. Years 1999-2000, 2000-01 and 2001-02 as reported in 83 ITD 792, besides in the assessee's own appeals for the A.Ys. 2002-03 to 2007-08. He also referred to the decision of the Tribunal Delhi Bench in the case of Sarvpriya Chits Pvt. Ltd. vs. CIT (60 ITD 674) wherein it was held that in case of chit fund business, principle of 7 ITA No. 651/Hyd/2012 M/s. Shriram Chits (P) Ltd.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Shriram Chits (P) Ltd.,, Hyderabad vs Assessee on 29 October, 2014

"11. The next ground (ground No. 4) is with regard to upholding the taxability of foreman dividend at Rs.8,44,39,492. Brief facts of the issue are that during the assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer found that the above referred dividend income on company's chits was claimed as not taxable in view of the decision of Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court in the case of Soda Silicate and Chemical Works (179 ITR 588). However, the Assessing Officer concluded that the contributors to the chit were not contributors to the mutual society. Besides, the profit arising as dividend on the chit subscribed by the Foreman is not distributed among the subscribers but among the share holders of the assessee company. He further found that Department's contention had been upheld by the Tribunal for Asst. Years 1999-2000, 2000-01 and 2001- 02 as reported in 83 ITD 792, besides in the assessee's own appeals for the A.Ys. 2002-03 to 2007-08. He also referred to the decision of the Tribunal Delhi Bench in the case of Sarvpriya Chits Pvt. Ltd. vs. CIT (60 ITD 674) wherein it was held that in case of chit fund business, principle of mutuality will not apply. Accordingly, the claim of exemption of Foreman's dividend was rejected and addition under reference was made.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1