Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 291 (1.61 seconds)M/S Lotus Realtech Pvt Limited vs State Of Haryana And Others on 23 September, 2020
Chatter Singh Baid And Ors. vs Corporation Of Calcutta And Ors. on 1 June, 1983
Unknown vs State Of Uttarakhand And Others on 25 October, 2023
M/S Ansal Prop.& Infrastructure Ltd. ... vs U.O.I.Thru.Secy.Ministry Of Law & ... on 28 February, 2020
Maruti Suzuki India Ltd vs Union Of India & Ors on 27 October, 2016
22. While coming to the aforesaid conclusions, this Court in P. Laxmi Devi case[(2008) 4 SCC 720] has relied on Anant Mills Co. Ltd. v. State of Gujarat [(1975) 2 SCC 175] , Vijay Prakash D. Mehta v. Collector of Customs [(1988) 4 SCC 402] andGu- jarat Agro Industries Co. Ltd. v. Municipal Corpn. of the City of Ahmedabad[(1999) 4 SCC 468] in which this Court has tak- en a consistent view that the right of appeal or right of revision is not an absolute right and it is a statutory right which can be circumscribed by the conditions in the grant made by the stat- ute. Following this consistent view of this Court, we hold that the proviso to Section 65(1) of the Act, requiring deposit of 50% of the demand before a revision is entertained against the demand is only a condition for the grant of the right of revision and the proviso does not render the right of revision illusory and is within the legislative power of the State Legislature.