Kanwal Narain vs L.F. Tellis on 29 September, 1983
But according to Surjit Singh v. Shri I.J. Chawla, 1979 (1) Rcr 4, the landlord is bound to give satisfactory explanation for not occupying any other premises belong to him that have fallen vacant shortly before an application for recovery of possession is filed or whilst it is pending. The explanation of the landlord in this case is that he let out those premises because the disputed ones were more suitable and the tenant had assured him to vacate those premises.