Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 16 (0.67 seconds)
Documents citing Union Of India & Anr vs Bhaskarendu Datta Majumdar on 27 August, 2010

Justice Udai Krishna Dhaon (Retd.) vs Union Of India And Ors. on 21 October, 2013

Also, the judgment in the case of Bhaskarendu Datta Majumdar (supra) relied upon by the petitioner again has no application W.P.(C) No.6589/2013 Page 12 of 16 because that judgment dealt with the aspect of ACC differing with the recommendation/advice given by Public Enterprises Selection Board (PESB) and in that context it was observed that when ACC differs with the recommendations of PESB, then, reasons must be given by the ACC. In the present case, the issue is not of ACC differing with the recommendations of PESB and in fact ACC in the present case had originally approved the selection of the petitioner, albeit which is bound to be in terms of the petitioner having a legal right to be appointed against an advertised vacancy.
Delhi High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 1 - V J Mehta - Full Document

Rajender Kumar And Anr vs State Of Raj & Anr on 28 January, 2011

28. It was also submitted by Mr. Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, Senior Advocate that reasons have to be recorded for exercising the power of cancelling the examinations. He has relied upon the decision in Union of India & Anr. Vs. Bhaskarendu Datta Majumdar, 2010 (9) SCC 38. In the instant case, various reasons have been given. Thus, it cannot be said that decision of cancelling the Limited Competitive Examination or examination for direct recruitment has been taken without giving any reasons.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 22 - Cited by 4 - A Mishra - Full Document

Sanjeev Mago And Ors vs High Court Of Judicature And Anr on 28 January, 2011

28. It was also submitted by Mr. Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, Senior Advocate that reasons have to be recorded for exercising the power of cancelling the examinations. He has relied upon the decision in Union of India & Anr. Vs. Bhaskarendu Datta Majumdar, 2010 (9) SCC 38. In the instant case, various reasons have been given. Thus, it cannot be said that decision of cancelling the Limited Competitive Examination or examination for direct recruitment has been taken without giving any reasons.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - A Mishra - Full Document

Rajesh Jain And Ors vs Raj High Court And Anr on 28 January, 2011

28. It was also submitted by Mr. Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, Senior Advocate that reasons have to be recorded for exercising the power of cancelling the examinations. He has relied upon the decision in Union of India & Anr. Vs. Bhaskarendu Datta Majumdar, 2010 (9) SCC 38. In the instant case, various reasons have been given. Thus, it cannot be said that decision of cancelling the Limited Competitive Examination or examination for direct recruitment has been taken without giving any reasons.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 22 - Cited by 1 - A Mishra - Full Document

Saroj Bala vs Uoi And Ors on 9 October, 2012

41. Ld. Counsel has relied upon law decided by Hon'ble Supreme Court in a case of Union of India v. Bhaskarendu Dutta Majumdar 2010 9 SCC 38, wherein it has held that "if ACC differs with the proposal or recommendations made by the Ministry concerned, it must give reasons for so differing to ward of any attack of arbitrariness. Those records will have to be recorded on file". In the absence of recording of reasons in the said matter, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has dismissed the appeal of Union of India.
Delhi High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 1 - S K Kait - Full Document
1   2 Next