Shashikala Parsottamdas Patel vs Lhr Of Badriprasad Poonamchand Agrawal on 21 July, 2023
In Kiranmal
Zumerlal Borana Marwadi vs. Dnyanoba
Bajirao Khot-[1983 (4) SCC 223] this
court observed :
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.52 seconds)Documents citing
Kiranmal Zumerlal Borana Marawadi vs Dnyanoba Bajirao Khot And Ors. on 7 March, 1983
Bolin Chetia vs Jogadish Bhuyan & Ors on 11 March, 2005
In Kiranmal Zumerlal Borana Marwadi v. Dnyanoba
Bajirao Khot and others (1983) 4 SCC 223, this Court has not
countenanced the practice of the High Court dismissing the
appeal by one word order 'dismissed' if numerous and serious
questions, both of law and facts were raised in the appeal.
U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad, Lucknow vs Sheo Narain Kushwaha & Ors on 25 April, 2011
Mahender Pal Chabra vs Subhash Aggrawal on 30 January, 2024
In Kiranmal
Zumerlal Borana Marwadi v. Dnyanoba Bajirao
Khot3, this Court observed:
Madan Mohan vs State Of Punjab And Ors on 31 March, 2022
In Kiranmal
Zumerlal Borana Marwadi vs. Dnyanoba Bajirao Khot -
[1983 (4) SCC 223] this court observed :
Satish Kumar vs State Of Punjab & Others on 17 May, 2022
Mohammad Abullas @ Abdul And Anr. vs Mussadi Lal And Ors. on 2 March, 2005
In case of Kiranmal Zumerlal Borana Marwadi v. Dnyanoba Bajirao Khot and Ors. the Apex Court pointed out "Let it be remembered that it was the first appeal against the decision of the trial court and therein the appellant can and has raised serious questions of law and disputed decision on facts. We, therefore, think that this is pre-eminently a fit case which ought to have been admitted and disposed of on merits." Without expressing an opinion the matter was remanded to the High Court.
Roshan Lal Bharadwaj vs Shiv General Finance (P.) Ltd. on 9 August, 1985
(4) One last point remains to be noticed. Counsel for the appellants has drawn our attention to Kiranmal Zumeralal Borana Marwadi v. Dnyanoba Bajirao Koht and others, Air 1983 Sc 461, and urged that the order of dismissal ought to have stated reasons. We do not think that the case cited, if properly construed, supports that proposition. As we understand that judgment, the Supreme Court merely held that, on the facts of that case, there were serious questions to be decided and the appeal ought to have been admitted. All the observations made have to be understood in that sense.
1