Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.76 seconds)

Ccl Ad vs State on 9 August, 2023

38. It is stated that though the breach in adhering to the time limit prescribed by the legislature may not by itself vitiate the preliminary assessment concluded at a later stage and the trial, the same should not be taken to mean that there can be an inordinate delay in a routine manner in concluding preliminary assessment by the Board and, thus, delay if any, must be not be unreasonable. Reliance in this regard is placed upon decision of Hon‟ble Gujarat High Court in Navinbhai Bijalbhai Dharmani (supra).
Delhi High Court Cites 39 - Cited by 0 - S K Sharma - Full Document

Ccl B vs State on 9 August, 2023

38. It is stated that though the breach in adhering to the time limit prescribed by the legislature may not by itself vitiate the preliminary assessment concluded at a later stage and the trial, the same should not be taken to mean that there can be an inordinate delay in a routine manner in concluding preliminary assessment by the Board and, thus, delay if any, must be not be unreasonable. Reliance in this regard is placed upon decision of Hon‟ble Gujarat High Court in Navinbhai Bijalbhai Dharmani (supra).
Delhi High Court Cites 39 - Cited by 0 - S K Sharma - Full Document

Ccl Ss vs State on 9 August, 2023

38. It is stated that though the breach in adhering to the time limit prescribed by the legislature may not by itself vitiate the preliminary assessment concluded at a later stage and the trial, the same should not be taken to mean that there can be an inordinate delay in a routine manner in concluding preliminary assessment by the Board and, thus, delay if any, must be not be unreasonable. Reliance in this regard is placed upon decision of Hon‟ble Gujarat High Court in Navinbhai Bijalbhai Dharmani (supra).
Delhi High Court Cites 39 - Cited by 0 - S K Sharma - Full Document

Ccl M A vs State on 9 August, 2023

38. It is stated that though the breach in adhering to the time limit prescribed by the legislature may not by itself vitiate the preliminary assessment concluded at a later stage and the trial, the same should not be taken to mean that there can be an inordinate delay in a routine manner in concluding preliminary assessment by the Board and, thus, delay if any, must be not be unreasonable. Reliance in this regard is placed upon decision of Hon‟ble Gujarat High Court in Navinbhai Bijalbhai Dharmani (supra).
Delhi High Court Cites 39 - Cited by 0 - S K Sharma - Full Document

Ccl C K vs State on 9 August, 2023

38. It is stated that though the breach in adhering to the time limit prescribed by the legislature may not by itself vitiate the preliminary assessment concluded at a later stage and the trial, the same should not be taken to mean that there can be an inordinate delay in a routine manner in concluding preliminary assessment by the Board and, thus, delay if any, must be not be unreasonable. Reliance in this regard is placed upon decision of Hon‟ble Gujarat High Court in Navinbhai Bijalbhai Dharmani (supra).
Delhi High Court Cites 39 - Cited by 0 - S K Sharma - Full Document
1