Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.34 seconds)
Documents citing Abid Mian vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 4 September, 2012

Akil Akhtar @ Bholu vs State Of Bihar on 16 July, 2013

No. 4582 of 2005 (Aabid Mian @ Aabid Akhtar Vs. The State of Bihar and others), the evidence of P.W. 1 Shahnawaz Khan paragraphs 13, 14 that accused persons have also initiated false cases against them. Existence of motive, however, is not enough for conviction. Conviction is to be made placing reliance on cogent evidence, provided prosecution has been able to establish date, time, manner of occurrence and identity of the accused persons is established beyond reasonable doubt.
Patna High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - V N Sinha - Full Document

Javed Akhtar vs State Of Bihar on 16 July, 2013

No. 4582 of 2005 (Aabid Mian @ Aabid Akhtar Vs. The State of Bihar and others), the evidence of P.W. 1 Shahnawaz Khan paragraphs 13, 14 that accused persons have also initiated false cases against them. Existence of motive, however, is not enough for conviction. Conviction is to be made placing reliance on cogent evidence, provided prosecution has been able to establish date, time, manner of occurrence and identity of the accused persons is established beyond reasonable doubt.
Patna High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - V N Sinha - Full Document

Md. Rashid Akhtar @ Rashid Akhtar vs State Of Bihar on 16 July, 2013

No. 4582 of 2005 (Aabid Mian @ Aabid Akhtar Vs. The State of Bihar and others), the evidence of P.W. 1 Shahnawaz Khan paragraphs 13, 14 that accused persons have also initiated false cases against them. Existence of motive, however, is not enough for conviction. Conviction is to be made placing reliance on cogent evidence, provided prosecution has been able to establish date, time, manner of occurrence and identity of the accused persons is established beyond reasonable doubt.
Patna High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - V N Sinha - Full Document

Faizi Akhtar vs State Of Bihar on 16 July, 2013

No. 4582 of 2005 (Aabid Mian @ Aabid Akhtar Vs. The State of Bihar and others), the evidence of P.W. 1 Shahnawaz Khan paragraphs 13, 14 that accused persons have also initiated false cases against them. Existence of motive, however, is not enough for conviction. Conviction is to be made placing reliance on cogent evidence, provided prosecution has been able to establish date, time, manner of occurrence and identity of the accused persons is established beyond reasonable doubt.
Patna High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - V N Sinha - Full Document

Abid Akhtar vs State Of Bihar on 16 July, 2013

No. 4582 of 2005 (Aabid Mian @ Aabid Akhtar Vs. The State of Bihar and others), the evidence of P.W. 1 Shahnawaz Khan paragraphs 13, 14 that accused persons have also initiated false cases against them. Existence of motive, however, is not enough for conviction. Conviction is to be made placing reliance on cogent evidence, provided prosecution has been able to establish date, time, manner of occurrence and identity of the accused persons is established beyond reasonable doubt.
Patna High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - V N Sinha - Full Document
1