Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 681 (0.93 seconds)

Rameshwar Prasad Ratre vs State Of C.G on 10 January, 2022

In view of the aforesaid discussion and in the light of 14 view taken by the Supreme Court in the matter of C.S. Girish (supra) and N. Vijayakumar (supra), it is clear that the prosecution has failed to prove its case of demand and acceptance of bribe money by the appellant. Therefore, only on the basis of recovery of the tainted money, conviction of the appellant is not sustainable. The finding of the trial Court is not in accordance with the evidence available on record as also not in accordance with law. The appellant is entitled to receive the benefit of doubt.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - R Dubey - Full Document

Rajesh Kumar @ Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs The State Of Bihar & Anr on 7 September, 2018

AIR 1979 SC 1408; Smt. Meena Balwant Hemke v. State of Maharashtra AIR 2000 SC 3377; T. Subramanian v. The State of T.N., AIR 2006 SC 836; A. Subair v. State of Kerela (2009) 6 SCC 587; State of Maharashtra v. Dnyaneshwar Laxman Rao Wankhede (2009) 15 SCC 200; C.M. Girish Babu v. CBI, Cochin, High Court of Kerala, AIR 2009 SC 2022; and State of Kerala and Anr. v. C.P. Rao (2011) 6 SCC 450)
Patna High Court Cites 36 - Cited by 1 - A K Trivedi - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next