Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (2.85 seconds)
Documents citing Sri Rameshwar Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 16 March, 2018

Mr.Puneeth Dalmia, New Delhi., vs The State, Rep Spl.Pp For Cbi., on 10 September, 2018

In "Sri Rameshwar Yadav v. The State of Bihar6" the Apex Court in a similar situation while dealing with a petition filed by a businessman, who has to travel long distance more than 1700 kms, sought for exemption from appearing before the Court by filing an application under Section 205 of Cr.P.C. in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 498-A of I.P.C. and under 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, held that grant of exemption from personal appearance in Court on each and every date was required to be considered in view of fact that application was filed much before their appearance in Court and finally granted exemption.
Telangana High Court Cites 45 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sanjay Kumar Agarwal vs Directorate Of Enforcement on 11 October, 2022

It is submitted that in Bhaskar Industries Ltd. [Bhaskar Industries Ltd. v. Bhiwani Denim & Apparels Ltd., (2001) 7 SCC 401 : 2001 SCC (Cri) 1254] , it was a case for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and in Rameshwar Yadav [Rameshwar Yadav v. State of Bihar, (2018) 4 SCC 608 : (2018) 2 SCC (Cri) 585] , it was a case for the offences under Section 498-A IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It is submitted that, in the present case, the allegations against the appellant are for the offences punishable under Section 120-B read with Sections 420 and 409 IPC and Sections 9, 12, 13(2) read with Sections 13(1)(c) and (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. Therefore, it is prayed to dismiss the present appeal.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 32 - Cited by 0 - S K Dwivedi - Full Document

Dasadri Murali Krishna & vs State Of Odisha (Vig.) .... Opp. Party on 20 August, 2025

In the above circumstances and the discussions made as above and further resorting to various decisions in the matter of Sri Rameshwar Yadav Vs. State of Bihar reported in 2018 (4) SCC 608, Benjamin Roul Vs. Sajal Das reported in 2017 (2) ILR (Cut) 964 and Banamali Pradhan Vs. State of Odisha reported in 2019 74 OCR 232, this Page 9 of 10 Court finds the impugned order to be not in consonance with the facts and law, and deserves to be quashed. Accordingly, the impugned order dated 22.04.2025 stands quashed.
Orissa High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - C Dash - Full Document

Namala Veera @ Vora vs State Of Odisha (Vig.) .... Opp. Party on 28 July, 2025

In the above circumstances and the discussions made as above and further resorting to various decisions in the matter of Sri Rameshwar Yadav Vs. State of Bihar reported in 2018 (4) SCC 608, Benjamin Roul Vs. Sajal Das reported in 2017 (2) ILR (Cut) 964 and Banamali Pradhan Vs. State of Odisha Page 4 of 5 reported in 2019 74 OCR 232, this Court finds the impugned order to be not in consonance with the facts and law, and deserves to be quashed. Accordingly, the impugned order dated 22.04.2025 stands quashed. The Petitioners are directed to appear once in person before the learned trial court on 11.08.2025. Upon such appearance of the Petitioners, the learned court shall pass appropriate order, dispensing with the subsequent appearance of the Petitioners, allowing them to be represented through their lawyer under Section 228 of the BNSS (205 of the Cr.P.C) with further direction that as and when the court would require the presence of the Petitioners, they shall appear in person.
Orissa High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - C Dash - Full Document
1