Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (1.31 seconds)
Documents citing Khem Singh vs The State Of Rajasthan on 1 April, 1978

Irfan Son Of Shri Noor Khan Deshwali vs State Of Rajasthan on 16 February, 2021

18. This court finds that the observations made in Khem Singh (supra) were of interregnum in nature and the law laid down by Supreme Court earlier was not brought to its notice. The provisions for compounding is also after confiscation. In none of the cases herein, the provisions under Rule 54 of the Rajasthan Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2017 have been pressed by the Mining Department. Till date, (Downloaded on 20/02/2021 at 08:57:48 PM) (16 of 30) [CRLMP-742/2021] neither penalty has been imposed nor confiscation has been done.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 32 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Asharam S/O Shri Ghanshyam B/C Meena vs State Of Rajasthan on 27 January, 2020

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ishwar Tiwari For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajendra Yadav, Govt. Counsel Mr. Fateh Raj Meena, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA Judgment / Order 27/01/2020 Mr. Rajesh Yadav, Principal Secretary & Transport Commissioner, Mr. Gaurav Goyal, Director, Mines & Geology, Mr.Rajendra Verma, RTO and Mr. Satyaveer, Addl. Transport Commissioner, Jaipur are present in person and submitted their suggestions which have been found to be very useful. It has also been informed that there is a PIL (Khem Singh Vs. State of Raj.) pending before the Principal Seat at Jodhpur wherein the Government is in the process of submitting its detailed recommendations with regard to illegal mining activities being conducted and transportation of illegal "Bajri" and other minerals.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1