Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 178 (7.85 seconds)
Documents citing Dr. Jishri Laxmanrao Patil, Member, The ... vs The Chief Minister Of State Of ... on 27 June, 2019

V.V.Saminathan vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu on 1 November, 2021

● A similar issue has been gone into in the case of Dr.Jaishri Lakshmanrao Patil v. State of Maharashtra reported in 2021 SCC Online SC 361 (Maratha Reservation Case) by the Constitution https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ 55/184 W.P.Nos.15679 of 2021, etc., batch Bench of the Honourable Supreme Court, wherein it is held that the State lacked jurisdiction in the teeth of Article 340 of the Constitution of India. The said judgment was delivered on 05.05.2021 and the law declared in the said judgement squarely applies to the facts of the present case and the impugned Act enacted by the State Legislature on 26.02.2021 is void ab initio.
Madras High Court Cites 107 - Cited by 0 - M Duraiswamy - Full Document

V.V.Saminathan vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu on 1 November, 2021

● A similar issue has been gone into in the case of Dr.Jaishri Lakshmanrao Patil v. State of Maharashtra reported in 2021 SCC Online SC 361 (Maratha Reservation Case) by the Constitution https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ 55/184 W.P.Nos.15679 of 2021, etc., batch Bench of the Honourable Supreme Court, wherein it is held that the State lacked jurisdiction in the teeth of Article 340 of the Constitution of India. The said judgment was delivered on 05.05.2021 and the law declared in the said judgement squarely applies to the facts of the present case and the impugned Act enacted by the State Legislature on 26.02.2021 is void ab initio.
Madras High Court Cites 107 - Cited by 0 - M Duraiswamy - Full Document

V.V.Saminathan vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu on 1 November, 2021

● A similar issue has been gone into in the case of Dr.Jaishri Lakshmanrao Patil v. State of Maharashtra reported in 2021 SCC Online SC 361 (Maratha Reservation Case) by the Constitution Bench of the Honourable Supreme Court, wherein it is held that the State lacked jurisdiction in the teeth of Article 340 of the Constitution of India. The said judgment was delivered on 05.05.2021 and the law declared in the said judgement squarely applies to the facts of the present case and the impugned Act enacted by the State Legislature on 26.02.2021 is void ab initio.
Madras High Court Cites 107 - Cited by 0 - M Duraiswamy - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next