Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.58 seconds)

Gopal Tiwari vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 16 November, 2018

Learned counsel for the parties moved applications duly signed by the petitioner as well as respondent No.2 and submitted that they are ready to compromise the matter. The parties have appeared before the Principal Registrar of this Court for verification of the factum of compromise. Vide report dated 1/11/2018, the Principal Registrar has given report which is perused. From the report it appears that the compromise has been arrived at voluntarily without any threat, inducement and coercion. On the basis of verification of report, contents of the applications and the submission made by learned counsel for the parties, the application is allowed. Parties are permitted to reach compromise as per the application. Counsel for the parties have relied upon the catena of judgments of Hon'ble Apex Court in the matters of Jagdish Channa & others Vs. State of Haryana & another, AIR 2008 SC 1968, Madan Mohan Abbot Vs. State of Punjab, AIR 2008 High Court of Madhya Pradesh (2 ) M.Cr.C. No. 43461/2018 (Gopal Tiwari Vs. State of M.P. & Anr.) SC 1969, Shiji Vs. Radhika & Another, (2011) 10 SCC 705, Narinder Singh & others Vs. State of Punjab (2014) 6 SCC 466, B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and another (2003) 4 SCC 675and Parbatbhai Ahir alias Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and others Vs. State of Gujarat and another, (2017) 9 SCC 641 and submits that as per laid down even in non-compoundable cases on the basis of compromise, criminal proceedings can be quashed so that valuable time of the court can be saved and utilized in other material cases.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1