Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.30 seconds)

Meenakshi Sharma And Another vs State Of Punjab And Another on 7 December, 2019

Heard counsel for the parties and perused the records. Learned counsel for the petitioner at the very onset sought to hammer home the point that the entire allegations levelled by the complainant are general and vague and that the court below has failed to take cognizance of the same that no prima facie case was made out and has sought reliance of State of Haryana vs Ch. Bhajan Lal, 1991(1) R.C.R. (Criminal) 383; Ajay Mitra vs State of M.P., 2003(1) R.C.R. (Criminal) 674; Preeti Gupta vs State of Jharkhand, 2010(7) SCC 667; Poonam Nagar vs State of Haryana and anr., 2016(1) R.C.R. (Criminal) 119; Sukhdeep Kaur 2 of 5 ::: Downloaded on - 23-12-2019 09:18:48 ::: Criminal Revision No. 847 of 2019 (O&M) -3- and another vs State of Punjab and another, 2015(4) R.C.R. (Criminal) 892; Rakesh Kumar and others vs State of Punjab and others, 2009(2) R.C.R. (Criminal) 565; Smt. Rani vs State of Haryana, 2006(1) R.C.R. (Criminal) 985 and Kiran vs State of Haryana, 1999(1) R.C.R. (Criminal) 97.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 1 - F D Singh - Full Document

Harjang Singh And Anr vs State Of Punjab on 13 July, 2018

5 of 7 ::: Downloaded on - 23-07-2018 00:28:06 ::: CRM-M No. 44206 of 2015 -6- Learned counsel for the petitioners has referred to various authorities, first of the those being Sukhdeep Kaur and another vs. State of Punjab and another 2015 (4) RCR (Criminal) 892, by a Coordinate Bench of this Court, wherein it was observed that in the recent past a tendency has developed for roping in all the relations of husband in dowry cases in order to browbeat and pressurize the immediate family of the husband. It was further observed that for the fault of the husband, the other relations cannot, in all cases, be held to be involved in the demand of dowry.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - H S Madaan - Full Document
1