Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 17 (0.72 seconds)
Documents citing Mani Singh @ Maddi vs State Of Punjab on 22 July, 2020

Dharminder Singh vs State Of Punjab on 18 March, 2021

Even if the aforesaid precedents being based on factual premise and not to be taken for consideration, but I deem it appropriate to consider the custody of the petitioner since 19.01.2019 and the alleged recovery from a transparent bag to be prima facie material to grant indulgence, particularly when the petitioner has no anticedent behaviour of criminal activity. Reliance can be placed on CRM-M No.17481 of 2020 titled Mani Singh @ Maddi Vs. State of Punjab decided on 22.07.2020, CRM-M No.25383 of 2020 titled Gurbaksh Singh Vs. State of Punjab decided on 02.09.2020 and CRM-M No.23706 of 2020 titled Hardum Vs. State of Haryana decided on 24.08.2020, wherein custody coupled with clean antecedent were considered for granting regular bail to the accused.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - R M Singh - Full Document

Parminder Kaler @ Bobi vs State Of Punjab on 11 October, 2021

[4]. Learned counsel further submitted that as per custody certificate produced by learned State counsel, petitioner is not involved in any other case. Petitioner is in custody since 10.12.2019. Long custody of the petitioner itself is a ground to grant him regular bail de hors the nature of quantity allegedly recovered. Learned counsel referred to CRM-M No.20566 of 2019 titled Veeru Vs. State of Punjab decided on 19.11.2019, CRM-M No.41779 of 2020 titled Gurpreet Singh Vs. State of Punjab decided on 17.12.2020, CRM-M No.17481 of 2020 titled Mani Singh @ Maddi Vs. State of Punjab decided on 22.07.2020 and CRM-M No.25382 of 2020 titled Gurbaksh Singh Vs. State of Punjab decided on 02.09.2020 in the aforesaid context.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - R M Singh - Full Document

Tanveer Singh vs State Of Punjab on 19 April, 2022

1 of 6 ::: Downloaded on - 20-04-2022 04:20:03 ::: CRM-M No.54631 of 2021(O&M) 2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for the last 3 years, 2 months and 11 days as on 18.04.2022 and as per custody certificate, he is not involved in any other case except the present case. Learned counsel refers to CRM-M No.20566 of 2019 titled Veeru Vs. State of Punjab decided on 19.11.2019, CRM-M No.41779 of 2020 titled Gurpreet Singh Vs. State of Punjab decided on 17.12.2020, CRM-M No.17481 of 2020 titled Mani Singh @ Maddi Vs. State of Punjab decided on 22.07.2020, CRM-M No.25382 of 2020 titled Gurbaksh Singh Vs. State of Punjab decided on 02.09.2020 and submits that by virtue of long incarceration of the petitioner, petitioner is entitled for regular bail de hors the nature of quantity.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - R M Singh - Full Document

Sushil Kumar Choore vs State Of Punjab on 13 May, 2022

Learned counsel for the petitioner also refers to CRM-M No.20566 of 2019 titled 'Veeru vs State of Punjab' decided on 19.11.2019, CRMM No.41779 of 2020 titled 'Gurpreet Singh vs State of Punjab' decided on 17.12.2020, CRM-M No.17481 of 2020 titled 'Mani Singh @ Maddi vs State of Punjab' decided on 22.07.2020, CRM-M No.25382 of 2020 titled 'Gurbaksh Singh vs State of Punjab' decided on 02.09.2020 and submits that by virtue of long incarceration of the petitioner, petitioner is entitled for regular bail de hors the nature of quantity. This is so particularly in view of his non- involvement in any other case.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - R M Singh - Full Document

Palla Singh vs State Of Punjab on 15 February, 2021

Learned counsel for the petitioner by relying upon CRM-M No.17481 of 2020 titled 'Mani Singh @ Maddi vs. State of Punjab, decided on 22.07.2020, CRM-M No.25382 of 2020 titled 'Gurbaksh Singh vs. State of Punjab' decided on 02.09.2020 and CRM-M No.23706 of 2020 titled 'Hardum vs. State of Haryana' decided on 27.08.2020 contended that period of custody of the petitioner since 12.04.2019 can be taken to be a ground for grant of regular bail to the petitioner.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - R M Singh - Full Document

Pawan Kumar Alias Lucky vs State Of Punjab on 15 September, 2021

Learned counsel refers to CRM-M No.20566 of 2019 titled 'Veeru vs State of Punjab' decided on 19.11.2019, CRM- M No.41779 of 2020 titled 'Gurpreet Singh vs State of Punjab' decided on 17.12.2020, CRM-M No.17481 of 2020 titled 'Mani Singh @ Maddi vs State of Punjab' decided on 22.07.2020, CRM-M No.25382 of 2020 titled 'Gurbaksh Singh vs State of Punjab' decided on 02.09.2020 and submits that by virtue of long incarceration of the petitioner, petitioner is entitled for regular bail de hors the nature of quantity. This is so particularly in view of his non-involvement in any other case.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 2 - R M Singh - Full Document

Jasreet Singh Alias Laddu vs State Of Punjab on 17 September, 2021

Learned counsel refers to CRM-M No.20566 of 2019 titled 'Veeru vs State of Punjab' decided on 19.11.2019, CRM- M No.41779 of 2020 titled 'Gurpreet Singh vs State of Punjab' decided on 17.12.2020, CRM-M No.17481 of 2020 titled 'Mani Singh @ Maddi vs State of Punjab' decided on 22.07.2020, CRM-M No.25382 of 2020 titled 'Gurbaksh Singh vs State of Punjab' decided on 02.09.2020 and submits that by virtue of long incarceration of the petitioner, petitioner is entitled for regular bail de hors the nature of quantity.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - R M Singh - Full Document

Gurvir Singh vs State Of Punjab on 1 October, 2021

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was sitting in the truck being driven by co-accused Dharamjit Singh @ Dharma. Petitioner is not the registered owner of the truck as the registered owner of the truck is co- accused Lehmber Singh. Petitioner is in custody since 11.08.2018 i.e. for the last 3 years, 1 month and 19 days as on 2 of 4 ::: Downloaded on - 02-10-2021 02:52:41 ::: CRM-M No.39836 of 2020(O&M) 3 30.09.2021. Petitioner is not involved in any other case. Learned counsel refers to CRM-M No.20566 of 2019 titled Veeru Vs. State of Punjab decided on 19.11.2019, CRM-M No.41779 of 2020 titled Gurpreet Singh Vs. State of Punjab decided on 17.12.2020, CRM-M No.17481 of 2020 titled Mani Singh @ Maddi Vs. State of Punjab decided on 22.07.2020 and CRM-M No.25382 of 2020 titled Gurbaksh Singh Vs. State of Punjab decided on 02.09.2020 and submits that by virtue of long incarceration of the petitioner, he is entitled for regular bail de hors the nature of the quantity allegedly recovered from him. This is so particularly in view of his non- involvement in any other case. Challan has already been presented. Charges have been framed, but no prosecution witnesses has been examined so far. Co-accused Shinder Singh has also been granted regular bail by the High Court vide order dated 01.12.2020 passed in CRM-M No.31849 of 2020.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - R M Singh - Full Document
1   2 Next