Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.30 seconds)

Pawan Kumar vs Dharam Singh Thakur on 22 May, 2025

4. By way of judgment of conviction and order of sentence, as referred to above, the learned trial Court has convicted the petitioner (hereinafter referred to as 'the accused') for the commission of offence, punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act, (hereinafter referred to as 'the N.I. Act') and sentenced him to undergo simple imprisonment, for a period of six months and to pay a compensation of Rs. 3,00,000/- to the complainant.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - V Singh - Full Document

Pawan Kumar vs Dharam Singh Thakur on 22 May, 2025

4. By way of judgment of conviction and order of sentence, as referred to above, the learned trial Court has convicted the petitioner (hereinafter referred to as 'the accused') for the commission of offence, punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act, (hereinafter referred to as 'the N.I. Act') and sentenced him to undergo simple imprisonment, for a period of six months and to pay a compensation of Rs. 3,00,000/- to the complainant.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - V Singh - Full Document

Pawan Kumar vs Dharam Singh Thakur on 22 May, 2025

4. By way of judgment of conviction and order of sentence, as referred to above, the learned trial Court has convicted the petitioner (hereinafter referred to as 'the accused') for the commission of offence, punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act, (hereinafter referred to as 'the N.I. Act') and sentenced him to undergo simple imprisonment, for a period of six months and to pay a compensation of Rs. 3,00,000/- to the complainant.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - V Singh - Full Document
1