Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.31 seconds)
Documents citing Tamil Nadu Government Officials' ... vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu ... on 31 January, 1985

V. Senthur vs Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission& ... on 6 May, 2016

As the issue involved in this matter is covered by our Order dated 22.1.2016 passed in SLP(C) Nos.2890-2894 of 2016, titled Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, represented by its Secretary, Government Estate vs. Government of Tamil Nadu, represented by its Secretary, Highways Department and Ors. and etc., the appeal is allowed. The impugned order of the High Court is set aside.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Sudha Gupta And Ors. vs State Of Madhya Pradesh And Ors. on 24 November, 1998

Similarly, in the decision in the case of Peoples' Union for Democratic Rights through its Secretary v. Police Commissioner, Delhi Police Head quartors (Writ Petition Criminal) 401-02 of 1985, decided on 13-1-1989, cited in AIR 1990 SC 513 at page 516, the State was found liable to pay compensation where the victim had been taken to police station for doing some work and on demand for wages was severely beaten and ultimately succumbed to the injuries, it was found that the State was liable to pay compensation.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 29 - Cited by 19 - Full Document

K.Senthil vs Tamil Nadu Food Safety & on 7 March, 2024

3. In fact, an order has been passed by the Madurai Bench of this Court in W.P.(MD)No.15073 of 2018 dated 26.09.2022 by observing that the Food Safety Officer cannot claim to got back to the Food Safety Department once he has been reverted. But in the earlier order of this Court made in W.P.No.23184 of 2021 dated 15.12.2023 [Tamil Nadu Food Safety Officers Association Vs. The Secretary to Government, Health and Family Welfare Department], a clear distinction has been made as to the situation involved in the cases and how some important materials were not placed before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court while dealing the Writ Petition in W.P.(MD)No.15073 of 2018. So the findings made in W.P.No.23184 of 2021 will be made applicable to the case of the petitioners as well. Once their reversion is found to be illegal then they are entitled to be absorbed only in the Food Safety Department irrespective of the direct recruitment made by the respondents.
Madras High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1