Sh. Lal Chand Yadav vs Cs Scj No. 611926/16 Lal Chand Yadav & ... on 22 June, 2021
b) Oriental Insurance Company Ltd vs Meenakshi Khosla
decided by Delhi High Court in RFA No. 218/2012
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.37 seconds)Documents citing
The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Meenakshi Khosla on 18 May, 2012
Ms. Mahima Puri vs Union Of India on 9 October, 2018
In support of his
contentions, Ld. Counsel has relied upon judgments Nopany
Investments (P) Ltd v. Santosh Singh (HUF), (2008) 2 SCC 728; V.
Dhanapal Chettiar v. Yesodai Amal, (1979) 4 SCC 214; S. Rajdev
Singh v. Punchip Associates Pvt Ltd, 145 (2007) DLT 226; Bajaj
Electrical Ltd v. Dhruv Devansh Investment & Finance Pvt Ltd,
(2011) IV Delhi 343; Santosh Arora v. M L Arora, (2014) 5 HCC
(Del) 703; Chander Kirti Rani Tandon v. M/s VXL Lodging N.
Boarding Services Pvt. Ltd, 2013 SCC OnLine Delhi 406; M C
Agrawal HUF v. Sahara India, 183 (2011)DLT 105; UCO Bank v.
Kalicharan & Sons, 127 (2006) DLT 21 (DB); State Bank of Bikaner
& Jaipur v. I.S. Ratta, 120 (2005) DLT 407 (DB), Punjab National
Bank v. S K Finance Corporation, 2018SCC OnLine Del9915; Basant
CS No.57728/2016
Mahima Puri and Ors v. Union of India & Anr. Page No.7 of 14
& Co. v. Osram India Pvt Ltd, 2018 SCC OnLine Del 7776; Crowne
Plaza Surya Hotel v. Peregrine Security P. Ltd, 2014 (2013) DLT 510;
Naeemuddin v. Babita Rani, 2013 Law Suit (Del) 4448; Oriental
Insurance Co. Ltd v. Meenakshi Khosla, 2012 (130) DRJ 319; Baldev
Singh v. Shinder Pal Singh, (2007) 1 SCC 341 and M. Chinnasamy v.
K C Palanisamy, (2004) 6 SCC 341.
Cs No. 1622/18 vs Sh. Tej Prakash Navaria on 24 February, 2020
In Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Meenakshi Khosla
2012 (130) DRJ 319, it has been held that if the legal notice was duly sent on the
correct address of the defendant, the same is deemed to be duly served.
Causes CourtCumGuardian Judge vs Sh. Neeraj Conductor on 7 March, 2020
In Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Meenakshi
Khosla 2012 (130) DRJ 319, it has been held that if the legal notice was
duly sent on the correct address of the defendant, the same is deemed to
CS No. 923/19 Pawan Kumar v. Neeraj Conductor Page No. 7 of 10
be due service. The legal demand notice bears the address of the
defendant.
The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Subodh Chand Gupta on 13 February, 2018
20. All the above judgments go to show that strict adherence of the policy
document is the norm. A serious doubt exists as to whether or not the notice
was given and whether the claim was submitted. Evidence of the Plaintiff‟s
witness does not inspire confidence. No independent evidence has been led
even to prove the occurrence of the accident. No surveyor was deputed by
the Insurance Company and the follow up, if any, also lacks urgency to say
the least. Learned counsel for Respondent relies upon Oriental Insurance
Co. Ltd. v. Meenakshi Khosla 2012 (130) DRJ 319 to submit that a legal
notice was served and despite serious assertions made in the same, reply to
the notice did not deal with the averments in the notice.
Rashpal Kaur vs Asha Rani Walia on 10 October, 2018
(2) The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Meenakshi Khosla
(RFA No. 218/2012 decided by Hon'ble High Court of Delhi on 18 th
May, 2012) in which Kalu Ram vs. Sita Ram (Supra) was relied
upon.
1