Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 118 (3.98 seconds)
Documents citing Mehmood Alam Tariq And Ors. Etc vs State Of Rajasthan & Ors. Etc on 11 May, 1988

Neeraj Kant And Ors. vs State Of Rajasthan And Ors. on 17 January, 2003

18. Supreme Court, in the case of all India State Bank Officers Federation's case (1997) 9 SCC 151 also considered the judgments delivered in case of State of U. P. v. Rafiquddin (10) and Mehmood Alam Tariq v. State of Rajasthan (11), wherein prescription of 35% & 33% qualifying minimum marks for viva voce were upheld and applying the same principle held that 25% of the aggregate marks for viva voce test cannot be treated as giving exaggerated weight to the viva voce test.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 10 - Cited by 1 - P C Tatia - Full Document

Anu Radha vs State Of Haryana And Others on 1 July, 2009

After referring to judgments in Surya Dev Rai v. Ram Chander Rai, AIR 2003 SC 3044, P.M. Bayas v. Union of India, (1993) 3 SCC 319, Ashok Kumar Yadav v. State of Haryana, (1985) 4 SCC 417, Ajay Hasia v. Khalid Mujib Sehravardi, (1981) 1 SCC 722, UPSC v. S. Thiagarajan, (2007) 9 SCC 548,G. Sarana (Dr.) v. University of Lucknow, (1976) 3 SCC CWP No.3445 of 2003 18 585,Kunda S. Kadam v. Dr. K.K. Soman, (1980) 2 SCC 355,Ashok Nagar Welfare Assn. v. R.K. Sharma, (2002) 1 SCC 749, Union of India v. Mohan Lal Capoor, (1973) 2 SCC 836, Lila Dhar v. State of Rajasthan, (1981) 4 SCC 159, R.S. Dass v. Union of India, 1986 Supp SCC 617, State of U.P. v. Rafiquddin, 1987 Supp SCC 401,UPSC v. Hiranyalal Dev, (1988) 2 SCC 242, Mehmood Alam Tariq v. State of Rajasthan (1988) 3 SCC 241,Dalpat Abasaheb Solunke v. Dr. B.S. Mahajan, (1990) 1 SCC 305,National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences v. Dr. K. Kalyana Raman, 1992 Supp (2) SCC 481,Indian Airlines Corpn. v. Capt.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 42 - Cited by 9 - A K Goel - Full Document

Sri Aswini Kumar Sarangi vs National Bank For Agricultural And ... on 4 January, 2021

(Mehmood Alam Tariq case [(1988) 3 SCC 241 : 1988 SCC (L&S) 757 : (1988) 7 ATC 741] , SCC pp. 251-52, para 20) "20. On a careful consideration of the matter, we are persuaded to the view that the prescription of minimum qualifying marks of 60 (33 per cent) out of the maximum marks of 180 set apart for the viva voce examination does not, by itself, incur any constitutional infirmity. The principles laid down in Ajay Hasia [(1981) 1 SCC 722 : 1981 SCC (L&S) 258] , Lila Dhar [(1981) 4 SCC 159 : 1981 SCC (L&S) 588] , Ashok Kumar Yadav [(1985) 4 SCC 417 : 1986 SCC (L&S) 88] , do not 17 militate against or render impermissible such a prescription. There is nothing unreasonable or arbitrary in the stipulation that officers to be selected for higher services and who are, with the passage of time, expected to man increasingly responsible positions in the core services such as the Administrative Services and the Police Services should be men endowed with personality traits conducive to the levels of performance expected in such services. There are features that distinguish, for instance, Accounts Service from the Police Service--a distinction that draws upon and is accentuated by the personal qualities of the officer. Academic excellence is one thing. Ability to deal with the public with tact and imagination is another. Both are necessary for an officer. The dose that is demanded may vary according to the nature of the service. Administrative and Police Services constitute the cutting edge 18 of the administrative machinery and the requirement of higher traits of personality is not an unreasonable expectation."
Karnataka High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - M Nagaprasanna - Full Document

Usha Agarwala vs Union Of India And Ors on 29 August, 2017

Pointing to the decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Manzoor Ali Khan vs. Union of India and Others14, Sushil Kumar Sharma vs. Union of India and Ors.15, Mehmood Alam Tariq and Others vs. State of Rajasthan and Others16 and Sanjay Dutt vs. State through C.B.I., Bombay (II)17 it 10 AIR 1956 SC 44 11 AIR 1964 SC 600 12 AIR 1955 SC 191 13 (1993) 3 SCC 723 14 (2015) 2 SCC 33 15 (2005) 6 SCC 281 16 (1988) 3 SCC 241 17 (1994) 5 SCC 410 WP(C) No. 23 of 2015 13 Mrs. Usha Agarwala vs. Union of India and Others was contended that a provisions of law cannot be struck down as unconstitutional merely on apprehension of misuse.
Sikkim High Court Cites 108 - Cited by 1 - M M Rai - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next