Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.46 seconds)

Sri Ramesh Kumar vs The Regional Transport Officer And on 10 July, 2012

5. Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the impugned order is not preceded by any fair and reasonable opportunity of being heard to the petitioner; that the findings recorded by the Regional Transport Officer, Mangalore are contrary to the provisions contained in Section 47 and also the Judgment of this Court in Mahesh C. Gandhi's case.
Karnataka High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - P B Sanganagouda - Full Document

Mr P C Hashir vs The State Government on 19 April, 2012

In fact, in similar circumstances, this Court _ in W.P.No.11501/2012 disposed of on 13.04.2012 referring to Section 47(5) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and to the i WP. 12458/2012 judgment of this Court in the case of MAHESH C.GANDHI VS. DEPUTY COMMISSIONR FOR TRANSPORT, BELGAUM & ANOTHER - 2005 AIR - KANT.H.C.R. 2140, has held that the requirement onĀ» the part of the petitioner to pay lifetime tax or.to get the vehicle . again registered in the State of Karnataka. would arise only if the vehicle in question was in-use for & period more than 12. months in the State of Karnataka.
Karnataka High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - P B Sanganagouda - Full Document
1