Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.28 seconds)

Ujjagar Singh vs Punjab State Electricity Board on 6 March, 2012

8. The learned counsel for the appellant submitted that District Forum has allowed the complaint but did not allow any compensation and cost as prayed in his complaint. It was further submitted that he was entitled to a compensation of Rs.500/- per day for the period of his connection remained disconnected as allowed by National Commission in the case titled "Chanderkant Mahadev Kadam Vs. Assistant Engineer MSEB" in revision petition No.604 of 2003 decided on 29.9.2003.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mr. Sanjib Bhattacharya vs The Assistant Engineer And Station ... on 7 April, 2010

In his WNA the complainant relied upon (1) NCDRC R.P.No. 371-373 dt. 10.4.08, (2) (2003) 4 SCC 739, (3) (2003) 8 SCC 567, (4) 2001 (3) ALD 313, (5) 2006(1) 610 (SC), (6) (1994) 1 SCC 243, (7) AIR 1994 SC 853 (DB), (8) SC judgement in Nizam Trust of Medical Science Vs. Prasantha S Dhananka & Others, (9) NCDRC judgement in Chandrakant Mahadev Kadan Vs. Assistant Engineer, MSEB Atpadi & Others.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 8 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

Sri Biswajit Mandal vs The Station Manager, W.B.S.E. D.C. Ltd, ... on 2 March, 2017

In the case of Chandrakant Mahadeb Kadam (supra) the Hon'ble National Commission took a serious exception on account of imposition of penalty of Rs.5,000/- for gross deficiency in providing electric connection after 65 days and imposed a compensation of Rs.500/- each per day and it has been observed that the amount shall be recoverable by the Department from its negligent and defaulting officials.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1