Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.30 seconds)
Documents citing Mi2C Security Facilities Pvt Ltd vs North Delhi Municipal Corporation on 23 October, 2018

M/S Mi2C Security & Facilities Pvt Ltd vs North Delhi Municipal Corporation on 16 May, 2023

6. According to the appellant, the increase in the wages was Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed LPA 201/2019 Page 2 of 5 By:HARMINDER KAUR Signing Date:19.05.2023 15:59:23 Neutral Citation Number : 2023:DHC:3482-DB required to be paid by the respondent. The appellant sent a letter dated 25.04.2015, requesting the respondent to pay the increased wages. However, the same was denied. Thereafter, there was exchange of communication between the parties, whereby the appellant reiterated its claims, and the respondent denied the same. This led the appellant to file the petition before this Court [W.P.(C) 8197/2017] captioned MI2C Security & Facilities Pvt Ltd v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation.
Delhi High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - V Bakhru - Full Document

M/S. Shreya Homes vs Kondakal Sai Reddy on 11 January, 2024

8. Having regard to the submissions made by the petitioner and the material on available on record it is seen that I.A.No.621 of 2022 was filed under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC praying the Court to reject the plaint on the ground that there is an arbitration clause in the Development Agreement-cum-GPA. As seen from the record the suit is filed in the year 2014 and the defendant has filed written statement in the year 2021 and he did not take the defense that suit is being bad in law. Section 8 of the Act, 1996, says that if the party so applies not later than when submitting, his first statement on the substance of the dispute refer the parties to the arbitration. Further the High Court of Delhi in MI2C Security Facilities Pvt. Ltd., Vs North Delhi Municipal Corporation W.P.(C) 8197/2017 & CM.NO.33688/2017, observed that if the party has filed its first statement without any intimation of the arbitration clause before the Judicial authority then it would be 4 presumed that the party has waived off its right to invoke the arbitration clause as per Section 8 of the Act, 1996.
Telangana High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1